Buyback Radar

The Graph GRT

Part buyback, part payoutRank#59in Low payout▼4Score14

Part of holders revenue is bought back, part is paid out; the split is not known.

Developer Tools, Arbitrum, 141 days of data

Low payout: less than $100k to holders in 30 days, or payouts on fewer than 8 of the 30 days (for a token that pays in cycles of a week or longer: more than one of the payouts its cycle predicts missed); ranked within this group

Market cap

$191.7M

price $0.0173 · 7d −7.7% · 30d −34.0%

FDV $200.7M (1.0× market cap)

source defillama

Counted per year

$41

holders revenue of the last 30 days, $5, × 365 ÷ 30, × type factor 0.75 (a mixed model counts 75%)

Mixedbuyback share 100%

Returns 0.0% of its market cap a year, using 100¢ of every $1 it earns.

Not a buyback: counts for 75% in the multiple (type factor 0.75), so the denominator is $41 instead of $55.

Multiple

4.6M×

median of all tokens 20.0×, against 4.6M× here

Run-rate

1.1M×

last 7 days $5 × 52 × 0.75 (type factor) = $177 a year

last week's payout to holders ran 4.3× the 30-day pace: the payout is speeding up

What we checked

  1. Valuation

    Multiple 4.6M× (type factor 0.75: a mixed model counts 75%), 231.7k× more expensive than the median of all tokens (20.0×; its category is too small for a peer group). The group's largest earner Hyperliquid trades at 21.1×: 218.9k× dearer per dollar returned to holders. On total revenue: 3.5M×, 2.0k× dearer than the revenue peer median.

  2. Distribution

    Mixed: Part buyback, part distribution or burn; the exact split is not known. Holders got $5 of $5 revenue in 30 days → buyback share 100%. DefiLlama: “Protocol tax on query fees, burned (legacy staking tax, and since Graph Horizon the 1% protocol payment cut burned by GraphPayments)”

  3. Sustainability

    Holders were paid on 2 of 30 days (7%); largest single day 65% of the month's holders revenue (one day carries the month, so the multiple is not a steady pace); paid to holders this week: 100% of the best week in 90 days. Revenue new / from ~$0 over 7 days and new / from ~$0 over 30 days, price −34% over 30 days.

What this does not tell you

The figures come from DefiLlama's adapter for each child protocol. Only a few tokens have an on-chain check (see How the buyback really works); for the rest, whether the tokens were really bought, burned or parked in a treasury wallet is not checked here. Unlocks count where DefiLlama or our research has a vesting schedule; team discretion and liquidity depth only once researched.

Flags

  • One-day spikeone day made 65% of the 30-day holders revenue. The multiple does not show a steady pace, so the token stays out of the Cheap lens and buy signals
  • Insufficient history140 days of data; g7, g30, divergence not computable yet and scored as neutral 50
  • Small peer group51 peers in universe; median taken from the universe level
  • Data issue: chain mapping missingData issue (chain mapping missing): warning, scores are computed as usual

How the buyback really works

Not researched yet. Everything above comes from DefiLlama and market data only.

Holders revenue / revenue (30d)
$5 / $5
last 30 closed days
To holders
Returns 0.0% of its market cap a year
FDV / dilution
$200.7M / 1.0×
FDV ÷ market cap
Price 7d / 30d
−7.7% / −34.0%
Revenue growth 7d / 30d
new / from ~$0 / new / from ~$0
versus the period before
Divergence
—
revenue growth minus price growth, 30d
DEX liquidity
$604k
DexScreener, representative pools
24h volume
$12.2M
all markets, CoinGecko
Unlocks 30d
$223k
DefiLlama vesting schedule
Revenue multiple
3.5M×
market cap ÷ revenue per year
Fee multiple
1.4k×
market cap ÷ fees per year
Distance to peak
100%
this week ÷ best week of 90 days
Data since
Jun 25
first day with holders revenue

Holders revenue and price

Holders revenue per day7-day averagePrice (right axis)

Multiple over time

today 4.6M× (scored) · peer median 20.0×

Market cap at close ÷ (holders revenue of the previous 30 days × 365 ÷ 30), with holders revenue capped at revenue and × the type factor: the same effective multiple as the peer median. Values above 100× are drawn at the top. Bands as on the meter; dashed line = peer median today.

Signal history

No signals for this token yet.

Versus peers

universe (whole universe) · 52 tokens (51 with a multiple) · median multiple 20.0× · Hyperliquid is valued 92.1× higher. Per dollar that counts for holders, The Graph is 218934.0× dearer.

Main-ranking peers only. Multiples count holders revenue capped at revenue, × the type factor (buyback 1 · buyback + burn 1 · burn 0.75 · mixed 0.75 · distribution 0.5 · unclear 0.5 · ve-distribution 0.25).

This token against its main-ranking peers: multiple, revenue multiple, buyback share, holders revenue, market cap and revenue growth
TokenDistributionMultipleRevenue multipleBuyback shareTo holders 30dMarket capRev. growth 30d
Pharaoh Exchangeve / bribes0.3×0.2×100%$1.3M$2.4M−53%
PaperStrategyBuyback + burn0.3×0.1×43%$743k$2.8M−2%
OTCBuyback + burn0.5×0.2×43%$284k$1.6M+99%
RamsesXMixed0.7×0.5×90%$347k$2.2M+8%
nestDistribution0.8×0.4×100%$868k$4.3M+30%
ORE ProtocolBuyback + burn1.0×1.0×99%$4.2M$50.2M+31%
StonkFunBuyback + burn1.8×1.1×60%$1.6M$36.7M−88%
upve / bribes2.0×1.0×100%$300k$3.7M−70%
Fake World AssetsBuyback + burn2.3×1.6×80%$142k$3.5M−72%
THORSwapMixed3.4×1.9×75%$311k$9.7M+37%
MarinadeBuyback5.0×2.5×50%$191k$11.7M−14%
ChainflipBuyback + burn5.6×5.6×100%$536k$36.3M+56%
PonsBuyback + burn6.1×6.1×104%$1.4M$101.8M−83%
PumpBuyback6.1×2.7×44%$21.5M$1.6B−27%
UsualMixed6.5×3.4×70%$372k$22.1M+72%
Aerove / bribes8.2×3.8×96%$7.4M$352.3M−8%
Tornado CashMixed9.7×7.3×100%$260k$23.1M−30%
SSV NetworkMixed12.1×9.1×100%$271k$30.0M−12%
SparkBuyback13.0×3.7×28%$344k$54.5M+144%
LighterBuyback15.8×12.8×81%$4.4M$841.1M+12%
edgeXBuyback16.4×7.1×43%$605k$120.4M−44%
GeodnetBuyback + burn18.7×14.9×80%$746k$169.4M0%
LidoBuyback18.8×7.1×37%$0$257.1M−5%
BankrDistribution19.3×8.5×86%$190k$23.9M−85%
ApeX ProtocolMixed19.3×14.5×100%$148k$26.1M−20%
deBridgeBuyback20.0×15.3×77%$352k$85.6M−12%
PancakeSwapBuyback + burn21.0×13.7×65%$2.4M$602.4M−29%
HyperliquidleaderBuyback + burn21.1×21.1×100%$68.7M$17.66B−4%
Yield Basisve / bribes22.6×8.0×100%$148k$14.3M41.0×
RaydiumBuyback27.2×16.9×62%$1.3M$421.9M−65%
SkyMixed27.3×8.5×41%$5.5M$1.37B−2%
Curve Financeve / bribes30.7×11.1×94%$2.6M$376.7M+44%
Maple FinanceBuyback35.9×7.2×20%$317k$138.2M+6%
UniswapBuyback + burn36.2×36.2×100%$8.2M$3.59B−19%
GMXDistribution37.2×13.6×73%$363k$82.1M+15%
Collector CryptBuyback + burn38.3×1.0×3%$380k$176.8M−5%
Convex Financeve / bribes46.5×13.8×95%$866k$153.1M−4%
AsterBuyback + burn51.2×∞—$2.7M$1.71B—
OrcaBuyback52.8×8.1×15%$120k$77.1M−37%
dYdXDistribution54.8×27.4×100%$234k$77.9M−21%
JupiterBuyback55.3×16.6×30%$1.3M$891.3M−32%
VeniceBuyback + burn68.9×68.9×100%$1.1M$946.3M+21%
KinetiqMixed77.8×34.3×59%$133k$94.7M−37%
RailgunDistribution80.5×25.7×65%$202k$108.6M−9%
Pendleve / bribes105×37.5×71%$421k$268.9M+41%
Render Network BMEBurn125×89.1×95%$753k$859.5M+242%
ChainlinkBuyback139×119×100%$5.3M$7.74B+23%
MeteoraDistribution162×4.8×17%$480k$166.1M−54%
NEAR ProtocolBuyback210×198×95%$1.8M$4.69B−18%
LiquityDistribution1.2k×8.4×81%$128k$16.2M+418%
The Graphthis tokenMixed4.6M×3.5M×100%$5$191.7Mnew / from ~$0
BONK.funMixed∞12.0×95%$1.5M$240.1M−67%
Score build-up14 of 100

Total score = 35% valuation + 25% momentum + 20% divergence + 20% quality − penalties, clamped to 0–100. Every number here can be recomputed from the figures on this page.

14of 100#59▼4top 78% one or more parts are the neutral 50
Valuation 0.0Momentum 12.5Divergence 10.0Quality 6.7penalties −15= 14.2
Valuation35%
0Valuation 0.0: HR half 0.0 (multiple 4627413.98×; 100 at ≤3×, 0 at ≥100×, log scale), revenue half 0.0 (revenue peer value 0.00×; 0 at ≤0.33×, 50 at 1×, 100 at ≥3×, log scale).Average of two halves. HR half: linear in log(multiple), 100 at ≤ 3×, 0 at ≥ 100×, 0 without effective HR. Revenue half: linear in log(revenue peer value), 0 at ≤ 0.33×, 50 at 1×, 100 at ≥ 3×; neutral 50 when the peer group falls back to the universe.
Momentum25%
50Momentum 50.0 (neutral): g7 unknown, g30 unknown; missing history gives the neutral 50.m = 0.5·g7 + 0.3·ln(day jump, clamped ±1.5) + 0.2·g30; 0 at m ≤ −0.7, 50 at 0, 100 at ≥ 1.1. Neutral 50 when g7 or g30 is missing; a missing day jump counts as 0.
Divergence20%
50Divergence 50.0 (neutral): d unknown (missing history).d = max(0, g30 − p30) when g30 > 0; 0 at d ≤ 0, 100 at d ≥ 1.5, linear.
Quality20%
33Quality 33.3: mean of days HR>0 7% → 0.0 (0 at ≤30%, 100 at ≥90%), largest day 65% of HR30 → 0.0 (0 at ≥60%, 100 at ≤15%), distance to peak 1.00 → 100.0 (0 at ≤0.25, 100 at ≥0.9).Average of: share of days with HR > 0 (0 at ≤ 30%, 100 at ≥ 90%), 1 − largest day ÷ HR30 (0 at ≥ 60%, 100 at ≤ 15%) and distance to peak (0 at ≤ 0.25, 100 at ≥ 0.9).
  • One-day spike: largest day 65% of the HR window: Momentum 50.0 → 50, Divergence 50.0 → 50.
  • Penalty −15 (unlocks_above_hr30): unlocks next 30d $223k above HR30 $5.

Penalties−15

−15Unlocks in the next 30 days above HR30unlocks next 30d $223k above HR30 $5

9 rules not applied, 3 wait for research data.

Where the numbers come from
Revenue source
1 active child
DefiLlama adapter per child
Price and market cap
defillama / defillama
latest fetch
Scored on
November 12, 2026
as-of date of the last compute run
On-chain verified
not yet
not checked yet
Protocols behind this token1 at DefiLlama

Per protocol: DefiLlama's methodology text, the distribution type we read from it and the sentence that decided it. The token takes the type of the protocol that returns the most to holders.

  • The Graph
    Developer Tools · Arbitrum
    type mixed · source text
    “Protocol tax on query fees, burned (legacy staking tax, and since Graph Horizon the 1% protocol payment cut burned by GraphPayments)”

    Protocol tax on query fees, burned (legacy staking tax, and since Graph Horizon the 1% protocol payment cut burned by GraphPayments)

    adapter on GitHub ↗