deBridge DBR

Fairly pricedRank#28▼4Score38

20.8× vs 20.2× for all tokens: in line with the median.

Bridge, OP Mainnet, BSC, Ethereum +29, 192 days of data

Market cap

$86.1M

price $0.0131 · 7d +0.6% · 30d −32.8%

FDV $131.4M (1.5× market cap)

source defillama

Buyback revenue / year

$4.1M

holders revenue of the last 30 days, $340k, × 365 ÷ 30

Buybackbuyback share 75%

Buys back 4.8% of its market cap a year, using 75¢ of every $1 it earns.

Multiple

20.8×

median of all tokens 20.2×, against 20.8× here

Run-rate

13.8×

last 7 days $120k × 52 = $6.3M a year

last week's payout to holders ran 1.5× the 30-day pace: the payout is speeding up

What we checked

Valuation
Multiple 20.8×, in line with the median of all tokens (20.2×; its category is too small for a peer group). The group's largest earner Hyperliquid trades at 20.2×: 1.0× dearer per dollar returned to holders. On total revenue: 15.6×, 2.6× dearer than the revenue peer median.
Distribution
Buyback: Revenue buys the token on the market; the tokens stay in circulation (treasury, stakers or LPs). Holders got $340k of $454k revenue in 30 days → buyback share 75%. DefiLlama: “Protocol revenue is used for buyback(started from 20th june 2025).”
Sustainability
Holders were paid on 27 of 30 days (90%); largest single day 5% of the month's holders revenue; paid to holders this week: 93% of the best week in 90 days. Revenue +18% over 7 days and −13% over 30 days, price −33% over 30 days.

What this does not tell you

The figures come from DefiLlama's adapter for each child protocol. Only a few tokens have an on-chain check (see How the buyback really works); for the rest, whether the tokens were really bought, burned or parked in a treasury wallet is not checked here. Unlocks count where DefiLlama or our research has a vesting schedule; team discretion and liquidity depth only once researched.

Flags

Small peer group51 peers in universe; median taken from the universe level

How the buyback really works

Not researched yet. Everything above comes from DefiLlama and market data only.

Holders revenue / revenue (30d): $340k / $454k; last 30 closed days
To holders: Buys back 4.8% of its market cap a year
FDV / dilution: $131.4M / 1.5×; FDV ÷ market cap
Price 7d / 30d: +0.6% / −32.8%
Revenue growth 7d / 30d: +18% / −13%; versus the period before
Divergence: 0.00; revenue growth minus price growth, 30d
DEX liquidity: $4.9M; DexScreener, representative pools
24h volume: $1.2M; all markets, CoinGecko
Unlocks 30d: $0; DefiLlama vesting schedule: nothing unlocks; next unlock Jan 16: $8.1M
Revenue multiple: 15.6×; market cap ÷ revenue per year
Fee multiple: 15.6×; market cap ÷ fees per year
Distance to peak: 93%; this week ÷ best week of 90 days
Data since: May 4; first day with holders revenue

Holders revenue and price

Holders revenue per day7-day averagePrice (right axis)▲ ▼ signal days (history below)

Multiple over time

today 20.8× (scored) · peer median 20.2×

Market cap at close ÷ (holders revenue of the previous 30 days × 365 ÷ 30), with holders revenue capped at revenue and × the type factor: the same effective multiple as the peer median. Values above 100× are drawn at the top. Bands as on the meter; dashed line = peer median today.

Signal history

Signal history of this token: date, type, price at the signal, price after 7 and 30 days, change since the signal and the outcome
Date	Signal	Price then	After 7d	After 30d	Since	Outcome
November 6, 2026	New in top 20closed Nov 6: now ranked #23	$0.0128	—	—	+3%	30-day check: day 6
October 31, 2026	Day jumpvoided Oct 31: revenue on the day was below the $50,000 minimum for this signal	$0.0139	−6%	—	−5%	not counted

Versus peers

universe (whole universe) · 52 tokens (51 with a multiple) · median multiple 20.2× · Hyperliquid is valued 196.8× higher. Per dollar that counts for holders, deBridge is 1.0× dearer.

Main-ranking peers only. Multiples count holders revenue capped at revenue, × the type factor (buyback 1 · buyback + burn 1 · burn 0.75 · mixed 0.75 · distribution 0.5 · unclear 0.5 · ve-distribution 0.25).

This token against its main-ranking peers: multiple, revenue multiple, buyback share, holders revenue, market cap and revenue growth
Token	Distribution	Multiple	Revenue multiple	Buyback share	To holders 30d	Market cap	Rev. growth 30d
PaperStrategy	Buyback + burn	0.2×	0.1×	42%	$780k	$1.9M	+17%
Pharaoh Exchange	ve / bribes	0.3×	0.2×	100%	$1.3M	$2.6M	−52%
OTC	Buyback + burn	0.5×	0.2×	43%	$292k	$1.9M	+111%
RamsesX	Mixed	0.7×	0.5×	97%	$368k	$2.2M	+8%
nest	Distribution	0.8×	0.4×	100%	$869k	$4.4M	+32%
Sapling	Buyback + burn	0.9×	0.7×	82%	$100k	$1.1M	−30%
ORE Protocol	Buyback + burn	1.0×	1.0×	99%	$4.3M	$51.7M	+37%
StonkFun	Buyback + burn	1.7×	1.0×	60%	$1.7M	$34.5M	−88%
up	ve / bribes	2.0×	1.0×	100%	$313k	$3.9M	−68%
Fake World Assets	Buyback + burn	2.4×	1.7×	80%	$149k	$3.9M	−70%
THORSwap	Mixed	3.7×	2.1×	75%	$312k	$10.4M	+55%
Marinade	Buyback	5.1×	2.5×	50%	$193k	$11.9M	−13%
Chainflip	Buyback + burn	5.4×	5.4×	100%	$520k	$34.4M	+59%
Pons	Buyback + burn	5.7×	5.7×	118%	$1.7M	$99.8M	−84%
Pump	Buyback	5.8×	2.6×	44%	$21.9M	$1.54B	−24%
Usual	Mixed	6.3×	3.3×	70%	$378k	$21.6M	+80%
Aero	ve / bribes	8.7×	4.0×	96%	$7.4M	$372.0M	−6%
Tornado Cash	Mixed	9.6×	7.2×	100%	$278k	$24.4M	−21%
SSV Network	Mixed	12.4×	9.3×	100%	$275k	$31.1M	−10%
Spark	Buyback	13.0×	3.7×	29%	$340k	$53.8M	+133%
Lighter	Buyback	14.6×	11.8×	81%	$4.4M	$775.1M	+14%
edgeX	Buyback	16.0×	7.0×	44%	$622k	$120.8M	−43%
Lido	Buyback	18.6×	6.2×	34%	$0	$255.2M	+6%
Geodnet	Buyback + burn	18.8×	15.1×	80%	$744k	$170.5M	0%
PancakeSwap	Buyback + burn	19.5×	12.8×	65%	$2.4M	$563.6M	−29%
Hyperliquidleader	Buyback + burn	20.2×	20.2×	100%	$68.8M	$16.94B	−3%
Bankr	Distribution	20.3×	8.8×	86%	$237k	$25.1M	−85%
deBridgethis token	Buyback	20.8×	15.6×	75%	$340k	$86.1M	−13%
ApeX Protocol	Mixed	21.2×	15.9×	100%	$145k	$28.2M	−21%
Yield Basis	ve / bribes	22.1×	7.8×	100%	$148k	$14.0M	41.0×
Sky	Mixed	26.7×	8.4×	42%	$5.5M	$1.34B	−3%
Raydium	Buyback	27.1×	16.8×	62%	$1.3M	$425.4M	−65%
Curve Finance	ve / bribes	29.3×	11.1×	94%	$2.6M	$374.4M	+44%
Collector Crypt	Buyback + burn	35.3×	0.9×	3%	$392k	$168.2M	−5%
GMX	Distribution	37.0×	13.5×	73%	$354k	$79.6M	+15%
Maple Finance	Buyback	37.2×	7.4×	20%	$326k	$147.5M	+14%
Uniswap	Buyback + burn	37.3×	37.3×	100%	$8.2M	$3.71B	−20%
Convex Finance	ve / bribes	47.5×	13.8×	95%	$881k	$155.5M	0%
Orca	Buyback	47.8×	7.9×	16%	$130k	$75.6M	−36%
Aster	Buyback + burn	50.2×	∞	—	$2.8M	$1.69B	—
Jupiter	Buyback	50.2×	15.9×	32%	$1.4M	$856.4M	−32%
dYdX	Distribution	51.6×	25.8×	100%	$240k	$75.2M	−15%
Venice	Buyback + burn	68.7×	68.7×	100%	$1.1M	$941.4M	+22%
Kinetiq	Mixed	84.8×	37.3×	59%	$133k	$103.2M	−37%
Railgun	Distribution	86.5×	28.1×	66%	$202k	$116.7M	−9%
Pendle	ve / bribes	104×	37.2×	72%	$411k	$260.0M	+39%
Render Network BME	Burn	122×	86.6×	95%	$751k	$832.8M	+240%
Chainlink	Buyback	152×	147×	100%	$4.3M	$7.66B	−2%
Meteora	Distribution	180×	5.2×	18%	$458k	$161.9M	−60%
NEAR Protocol	Buyback	206×	194×	94%	$1.8M	$4.51B	−18%
Liquity	Distribution	1.2k×	8.2×	80%	$128k	$15.8M	+409%
BONK.fun	Mixed	∞	11.7×	95%	$1.5M	$233.7M	−67%

Score build-up38 of 100

Total score = 35% valuation + 25% momentum + 20% divergence + 20% quality − penalties, clamped to 0–100. Every number here can be recomputed from the figures on this page.

38of 100#28▼4top 54%

Valuation 9.1Momentum 8.8Divergence 0.0Quality 20.0= 37.9

Valuation35%

26Valuation 25.9: HR half 44.8 (multiple 20.82×; 100 at ≤3×, 0 at ≥100×, log scale), revenue half 7.0 (revenue peer value 0.39×; 0 at ≤0.33×, 50 at 1×, 100 at ≥3×, log scale).Average of two halves. HR half: linear in log(multiple), 100 at ≤ 3×, 0 at ≥ 100×, 0 without effective HR. Revenue half: linear in log(revenue peer value), 0 at ≤ 0.33×, 50 at 1×, 100 at ≥ 3×; neutral 50 when the peer group falls back to the universe.

Momentum25%

35Momentum 35.3: m = 0.5·g7 0.168 + 0.3·(ln(day jump 0.42) clamped ±1.5 = −0.872) + 0.2·g30 −0.142 = −0.206; 0 at ≤−0.7, 50 at 0, 100 at ≥1.1.m = 0.5·g7 + 0.3·ln(day jump, clamped ±1.5) + 0.2·g30; 0 at m ≤ −0.7, 50 at 0, 100 at ≥ 1.1. Neutral 50 when g7 or g30 is missing; a missing day jump counts as 0.

Divergence20%

0Divergence 0.0: d = g30 − p30 = 0.000; 0 at ≤0, 100 at ≥1.5.d = max(0, g30 − p30) when g30 > 0; 0 at d ≤ 0, 100 at d ≥ 1.5, linear.

Quality20%

100Quality 100.0: mean of days HR>0 90% → 100.0 (0 at ≤30%, 100 at ≥90%), largest day 5% of HR30 → 100.0 (0 at ≥60%, 100 at ≤15%), distance to peak 0.93 → 100.0 (0 at ≤0.25, 100 at ≥0.9).Average of: share of days with HR > 0 (0 at ≤ 30%, 100 at ≥ 90%), 1 − largest day ÷ HR30 (0 at ≥ 60%, 100 at ≤ 15%) and distance to peak (0 at ≤ 0.25, 100 at ≥ 0.9).

Penaltiesnone

No penalty applies — 10 rules checked, 3 wait for research data

Where the numbers come from

Revenue source: 1 active child; DefiLlama adapter per child
Price and market cap: defillama / defillama; latest fetch
Scored on: November 11, 2026; as-of date of the last compute run
On-chain verified: not yet; not checked yet

Protocols behind this token1 at DefiLlama

Per protocol: DefiLlama's methodology text, the distribution type we read from it and the sentence that decided it. The token takes the type of the protocol that returns the most to holders.

deBridge
Bridge · OP Mainnet, BSC, Ethereum, Linea, Avalanche, Polygon, Solana, Arbitrum, Base, Fantom, Neon, Gnosis, Metis, Sonic, Cronos zkEVM, Abstract, Berachain, Data Network, Hyperliquid L1, Zircuit, Flow, BOB, Mantle, Plume Mainnet, Sophon, Sei, Tron, Plasma, Injective, Monad, Cronos, Robinhood Chain
type buyback · source text
“Protocol revenue is used for buyback(started from 20th june 2025).”
Protocol revenue is used for buyback(started from 20th june 2025).
adapter on GitHub ↗