Buyback Radar

Collector Crypt CARDS

Sell signal activeRank#47▲3Score25

Sell signal held since Nov 2, before tracking started. no variant; REV ratio 0.7×, HR ratio 0.1×. Still open: payout at 13% of its 90-day peak. See Signals.

Physical TCG, Solana, Base, Robinhood Chain, 37 days of data

Active signals 2

  • Sell signalheld since Nov 2

    Revenue this week $1.6M, 71% of the week before.

    Weekly revenue drop: revenue this week $1.6M, 0.7× the week before, paid to holders 0.1× the week before. Still open: payout at 13% of its 90-day peak.

  • New protocol with revenuesince Oct 31

    New protocol, 25 days of data: $232k to holders this week, $392k in 30 days.

Market cap

$168.2M

price $0.193 · 7d −25.1% · 30d −29.6%

FDV $381.0M (2.3× market cap)

source defillama

Buyback revenue / year

$4.8M

holders revenue of the last 30 days, $392k, × 365 ÷ 30

Buyback + burnbuyback share 3%

Buys back 2.8% of its market cap a year, using 3¢ of every $1 it earns.

Multiple

35.3×

median of all tokens 20.2×, against 35.3× here

Run-rate

105×

last 7 days $31k × 52 = $1.6M a year

last week's payout to holders ran at 34% of the 30-day pace: the payout is slowing

What we checked

  1. Valuation

    Multiple 35.3×, 1.7× more expensive than the median of all tokens (20.2×; its category is too small for a peer group). The group's largest earner Hyperliquid trades at 20.2×: 1.7× dearer per dollar returned to holders. On total revenue: 0.9×, 19.3× cheaper than the revenue peer median.

  2. Distribution

    Buyback + burn: Revenue buys the token on the market and the bought tokens are burned. Holders got $392k of $14.7M revenue in 30 days → buyback share 3%. DefiLlama: “Token Buyback: CARDS bought back with gacha revenue, counted at purchase.”

  3. Sustainability

    Holders were paid on 30 of 30 days (100%); largest single day 45% of the month's holders revenue; paid to holders this week: 13% of the best week in 90 days (more than half below peak). Revenue −29% over 7 days and −5% over 30 days, price −30% over 30 days.

What this does not tell you

The figures come from DefiLlama's adapter for each child protocol. Only a few tokens have an on-chain check (see How the buyback really works); for the rest, whether the tokens were really bought, burned or parked in a treasury wallet is not checked here. Unlocks count where DefiLlama or our research has a vesting schedule; team discretion and liquidity depth only once researched.

Flags

  • Sell signalheld since Nov 2, before tracking started; no variant; REV ratio 0.7×, HR ratio 0.1×. Still open: payout at 13% of its 90-day peak. See Signals
  • Payout >50% below peakthis week's holders revenue is 13% of its best week in the last 90 days ($232k)
  • Small peer group51 peers in universe; median taken from the universe level

How the buyback really works

Not researched yet. Everything above comes from DefiLlama and market data only.

Holders revenue / revenue (30d)
$392k / $14.7M
last 30 closed days
To holders
Buys back 2.8% of its market cap a year
FDV / dilution
$381.0M / 2.3×
FDV ÷ market cap
Price 7d / 30d
−25.1% / −29.6%
Revenue growth 7d / 30d
−29% / −5%
versus the period before
Divergence
0.00
revenue growth minus price growth, 30d
DEX liquidity
$5.3M
DexScreener, representative pools
24h volume
$9.0M
all markets, CoinGecko
Unlocks 30d
—
no unlock schedule for this token
Revenue multiple
0.9×
market cap ÷ revenue per year
Fee multiple
0.9×
market cap ÷ fees per year
Distance to peak
13%
this week ÷ best week of 90 days
Data since
Oct 6
first day with holders revenue

Holders revenue and price

Holders revenue per day7-day averagePrice (right axis)▲ ▼ signal days (history below)

Multiple over time

today 35.3× (scored) · peer median 20.2×

Market cap at close ÷ (holders revenue of the previous 30 days × 365 ÷ 30), with holders revenue capped at revenue and × the type factor: the same effective multiple as the peer median. Values above 100× are drawn at the top. Bands as on the meter; dashed line = peer median today.

Signal history

Signal history of this token: date, type, price at the signal, price after 7 and 30 days, change since the signal and the outcome
DateSignalPrice thenAfter 7dAfter 30dSinceOutcome
November 2, 2026Sell signalactive$0.26——−26%not counted
October 31, 2026New protocol with revenueactive$0.238−5%—−19%30-day check: day 11

Versus peers

universe (whole universe) · 52 tokens (51 with a multiple) · median multiple 20.2× · Hyperliquid is valued 100.7× higher. Per dollar that counts for holders, Collector Crypt is 1.7× dearer.

Main-ranking peers only. Multiples count holders revenue capped at revenue, × the type factor (buyback 1 · buyback + burn 1 · burn 0.75 · mixed 0.75 · distribution 0.5 · unclear 0.5 · ve-distribution 0.25).

This token against its main-ranking peers: multiple, revenue multiple, buyback share, holders revenue, market cap and revenue growth
TokenDistributionMultipleRevenue multipleBuyback shareTo holders 30dMarket capRev. growth 30d
PaperStrategyBuyback + burn0.2×0.1×42%$780k$1.9M+17%
Pharaoh Exchangeve / bribes0.3×0.2×100%$1.3M$2.6M−52%
OTCBuyback + burn0.5×0.2×43%$292k$1.9M+111%
RamsesXMixed0.7×0.5×97%$368k$2.2M+8%
nestDistribution0.8×0.4×100%$869k$4.4M+32%
SaplingBuyback + burn0.9×0.7×82%$100k$1.1M−30%
ORE ProtocolBuyback + burn1.0×1.0×99%$4.3M$51.7M+37%
StonkFunBuyback + burn1.7×1.0×60%$1.7M$34.5M−88%
upve / bribes2.0×1.0×100%$313k$3.9M−68%
Fake World AssetsBuyback + burn2.4×1.7×80%$149k$3.9M−70%
THORSwapMixed3.7×2.1×75%$312k$10.4M+55%
MarinadeBuyback5.1×2.5×50%$193k$11.9M−13%
ChainflipBuyback + burn5.4×5.4×100%$520k$34.4M+59%
PonsBuyback + burn5.7×5.7×118%$1.7M$99.8M−84%
PumpBuyback5.8×2.6×44%$21.9M$1.54B−24%
UsualMixed6.3×3.3×70%$378k$21.6M+80%
Aerove / bribes8.7×4.0×96%$7.4M$372.0M−6%
Tornado CashMixed9.6×7.2×100%$278k$24.4M−21%
SSV NetworkMixed12.4×9.3×100%$275k$31.1M−10%
SparkBuyback13.0×3.7×29%$340k$53.8M+133%
LighterBuyback14.6×11.8×81%$4.4M$775.1M+14%
edgeXBuyback16.0×7.0×44%$622k$120.8M−43%
LidoBuyback18.6×6.2×34%$0$255.2M+6%
GeodnetBuyback + burn18.8×15.1×80%$744k$170.5M0%
PancakeSwapBuyback + burn19.5×12.8×65%$2.4M$563.6M−29%
HyperliquidleaderBuyback + burn20.2×20.2×100%$68.8M$16.94B−3%
BankrDistribution20.3×8.8×86%$237k$25.1M−85%
deBridgeBuyback20.8×15.6×75%$340k$86.1M−13%
ApeX ProtocolMixed21.2×15.9×100%$145k$28.2M−21%
Yield Basisve / bribes22.1×7.8×100%$148k$14.0M41.0×
SkyMixed26.7×8.4×42%$5.5M$1.34B−3%
RaydiumBuyback27.1×16.8×62%$1.3M$425.4M−65%
Curve Financeve / bribes29.3×11.1×94%$2.6M$374.4M+44%
Collector Cryptthis tokenBuyback + burn35.3×0.9×3%$392k$168.2M−5%
GMXDistribution37.0×13.5×73%$354k$79.6M+15%
Maple FinanceBuyback37.2×7.4×20%$326k$147.5M+14%
UniswapBuyback + burn37.3×37.3×100%$8.2M$3.71B−20%
Convex Financeve / bribes47.5×13.8×95%$881k$155.5M0%
OrcaBuyback47.8×7.9×16%$130k$75.6M−36%
AsterBuyback + burn50.2×∞—$2.8M$1.69B—
JupiterBuyback50.2×15.9×32%$1.4M$856.4M−32%
dYdXDistribution51.6×25.8×100%$240k$75.2M−15%
VeniceBuyback + burn68.7×68.7×100%$1.1M$941.4M+22%
KinetiqMixed84.8×37.3×59%$133k$103.2M−37%
RailgunDistribution86.5×28.1×66%$202k$116.7M−9%
Pendleve / bribes104×37.2×72%$411k$260.0M+39%
Render Network BMEBurn122×86.6×95%$751k$832.8M+240%
ChainlinkBuyback152×147×100%$4.3M$7.66B−2%
MeteoraDistribution180×5.2×18%$458k$161.9M−60%
NEAR ProtocolBuyback206×194×94%$1.8M$4.51B−18%
LiquityDistribution1.2k×8.2×80%$128k$15.8M+409%
BONK.funMixed∞11.7×95%$1.5M$233.7M−67%
Score build-up25 of 100

Total score = 35% valuation + 25% momentum + 20% divergence + 20% quality − penalties, clamped to 0–100. Every number here can be recomputed from the figures on this page.

25of 100#47▲3top 92% one or more parts are the neutral 50
Valuation 14.0Momentum 12.5Divergence 0.0Quality 8.8penalties −10= 25.3
Valuation35%
40Valuation 39.9: HR half 29.7 (multiple 35.26×; 100 at ≤3×, 0 at ≥100×, log scale), revenue half 50.0 (revenue peer group fell back to the universe → neutral 50; 0 at ≤0.33×, 50 at 1×, 100 at ≥3×, log scale).Average of two halves. HR half: linear in log(multiple), 100 at ≤ 3×, 0 at ≥ 100×, 0 without effective HR. Revenue half: linear in log(revenue peer value), 0 at ≤ 0.33×, 50 at 1×, 100 at ≥ 3×; neutral 50 when the peer group falls back to the universe.
Momentum25%capped
5054 before the peak capMomentum 53.5: m = 0.5·g7 −0.337 + 0.3·(ln(day jump 2.36) clamped ±1.5 = 0.857) + 0.2·g30 −0.053 = 0.078; 0 at ≤−0.7, 50 at 0, 100 at ≥1.1.m = 0.5·g7 + 0.3·ln(day jump, clamped ±1.5) + 0.2·g30; 0 at m ≤ −0.7, 50 at 0, 100 at ≥ 1.1. Neutral 50 when g7 or g30 is missing; a missing day jump counts as 0.
Divergence20%capped
0Divergence 0.0: d = g30 − p30 = 0.000; 0 at ≤0, 100 at ≥1.5.d = max(0, g30 − p30) when g30 > 0; 0 at d ≤ 0, 100 at d ≥ 1.5, linear.
Quality20%
44Quality 44.1: mean of days HR>0 100% → 100.0 (0 at ≤30%, 100 at ≥90%), largest day 45% of HR30 → 32.4 (0 at ≥60%, 100 at ≤15%), distance to peak 0.13 → 0.0 (0 at ≤0.25, 100 at ≥0.9).Average of: share of days with HR > 0 (0 at ≤ 30%, 100 at ≥ 90%), 1 − largest day ÷ HR30 (0 at ≥ 60%, 100 at ≤ 15%) and distance to peak (0 at ≤ 0.25, 100 at ≥ 0.9).
  • Penalty −5 (dilution_above_2): dilution ratio 2.27 above 2.
  • Penalty −5 (history_30_60): history 37 days (30-60).

HR7 is below 50% of its 90-day peak: momentum and divergence are capped at 50. This is not a penalty; the distance already counts in quality.

Penalties−10

−5Dilution ratio above 2dilution ratio 2.27 above 2
−5History 30 to 60 dayshistory 37 days (30-60)

8 rules not applied, 3 wait for research data.

Where the numbers come from
Revenue source
1 active child
DefiLlama adapter per child
Price and market cap
defillama / defillama
latest fetch
Scored on
November 11, 2026
as-of date of the last compute run
On-chain verified
not yet
not checked yet
Protocols behind this token1 at DefiLlama

Per protocol: DefiLlama's methodology text, the distribution type we read from it and the sentence that decided it. The token takes the type of the protocol that returns the most to holders.

  • Collector Crypt
    Physical TCG · Solana, Base, Robinhood Chain
    type buyback-burn · source label
    “Token Buyback: CARDS bought back with gacha revenue, counted at purchase.”

    CARDS bought back with gacha revenue (since April 2026) and the CARDS side of the treasury's claimed LP fees, which the team burns.

    LP Fees
    CARDS side of the claimed LP fees, burned by the team, counted at claim.
    Token Buyback
    CARDS bought back with gacha revenue, counted at purchase.
    adapter on GitHub ↗