Buyback Radar

SSV Network SSV

Part buyback, part payoutRank#7▲1Score56

Part of holders revenue is bought back, part is paid out; the split is not known.

Staking Pool, Ethereum, 192 days of data

Active signals 2

  • New in top 20held since Oct 30

    Ranked #7 on Nov 11, up from #8 the day before.

  • Multiple below mediansince Oct 30

    Multiple 12.4×, below the 15.5× median of Staking (4 tokens).

Market cap

$31.1M

price $2.08 · 7d −10.9% · 30d −25.1%

FDV $30.6M (1.0× market cap)

source defillama

Counted per year

$2.5M

holders revenue of the last 30 days, $275k, × 365 ÷ 30, × type factor 0.75 (a mixed model counts 75%)

Mixedbuyback share 100%

Returns 11% of its market cap a year, using 100¢ of every $1 it earns.

Not a buyback: counts for 75% in the multiple (type factor 0.75), so the denominator is $2.5M instead of $3.3M.

Multiple

12.4×

peer median 15.5× (Staking, 4 tokens), against 12.4× here

Run-rate

13.4×

last 7 days $59k × 52 × 0.75 (type factor) = $2.3M a year

last week's payout in line with the 30-day pace

What we checked

  1. Valuation

    Multiple 12.4× (type factor 0.75: a mixed model counts 75%), 1.3× cheaper than its Staking peers (median 15.5×, 4 tokens). The group's largest earner Lido trades at 18.6×: 1.5× cheaper per dollar returned to holders. On total revenue: 9.3×, 2.3× cheaper than the revenue peer median.

  2. Distribution

    Mixed: Part buyback, part distribution or burn; the exact split is not known. Holders got $275k of $275k revenue in 30 days → buyback share 100%. DefiLlama: “Token Burns: Pre-migration: SSV tokens burned to the zero address.”

  3. Sustainability

    Holders were paid on 30 of 30 days (100%); largest single day 4% of the month's holders revenue; paid to holders this week: 79% of the best week in 90 days. Revenue −7% over 7 days and −10% over 30 days, price −25% over 30 days.

What this does not tell you

The figures come from DefiLlama's adapter for each child protocol. Only a few tokens have an on-chain check (see How the buyback really works); for the rest, whether the tokens were really bought, burned or parked in a treasury wallet is not checked here. Unlocks count where DefiLlama or our research has a vesting schedule; team discretion and liquidity depth only once researched.

Flags

No flags today: no active sell signal, and nothing in the data of this token needs a caveat.

How the buyback really works

Not researched yet. Everything above comes from DefiLlama and market data only.

Holders revenue / revenue (30d)
$275k / $275k
last 30 closed days
To holders
Returns 11% of its market cap a year
FDV / dilution
$30.6M / 1.0×
FDV ÷ market cap
Price 7d / 30d
−10.9% / −25.1%
Revenue growth 7d / 30d
−7% / −10%
versus the period before
Divergence
0.00
revenue growth minus price growth, 30d
DEX liquidity
$297k
DexScreener, representative pools
24h volume
$3.4M
all markets, CoinGecko
Unlocks 30d
—
no unlock schedule for this token
Revenue multiple
9.3×
market cap ÷ revenue per year
Fee multiple
9.0×
market cap ÷ fees per year
Distance to peak
79%
this week ÷ best week of 90 days
Data since
May 4
first day with holders revenue

Holders revenue and price

Holders revenue per day7-day averagePrice (right axis)▲ ▼ signal days (history below)

Multiple over time

today 12.4× (scored) · peer median 15.5×

Market cap at close ÷ (holders revenue of the previous 30 days × 365 ÷ 30), with holders revenue capped at revenue and × the type factor: the same effective multiple as the peer median. Values above 100× are drawn at the top. Bands as on the meter; dashed line = peer median today.

Signal history

Signal history of this token: date, type, price at the signal, price after 7 and 30 days, change since the signal and the outcome
DateSignalPrice thenAfter 7dAfter 30dSinceOutcome
October 30, 2026New in top 20active$2.260%—−8%not counted
October 31, 2026Multiple below medianactive$2.260%—−8%30-day check: day 11

Versus peers

Staking (merged group) · 4 tokens · median multiple 15.5× · Lido is valued 8.2× higher. Per dollar that counts for holders, SSV Network is 1.5× cheaper.

Main-ranking peers only. Multiples count holders revenue capped at revenue, × the type factor (buyback 1 · buyback + burn 1 · burn 0.75 · mixed 0.75 · distribution 0.5 · unclear 0.5 · ve-distribution 0.25).

This token against its main-ranking peers: multiple, revenue multiple, buyback share, holders revenue, market cap and revenue growth
TokenDistributionMultipleRevenue multipleBuyback shareTo holders 30dMarket capRev. growth 30d
MarinadeBuyback5.1×2.5×50%$193k$11.9M−13%
SSV Networkthis tokenMixed12.4×9.3×100%$275k$31.1M−10%
LidoleaderBuyback18.6×6.2×34%$0$255.2M+6%
KinetiqMixed84.8×37.3×59%$133k$103.2M−37%
Score build-up56 of 100

Total score = 35% valuation + 25% momentum + 20% divergence + 20% quality − penalties, clamped to 0–100. Every number here can be recomputed from the figures on this page.

56of 100#7▲1top 12%
Valuation 25.9Momentum 11.1Divergence 0.0Quality 18.8= 55.8
Valuation35%
74Valuation 73.9: HR half 59.6 (multiple 12.39×; 100 at ≤3×, 0 at ≥100×, log scale), revenue half 88.2 (revenue peer value 2.31×; 0 at ≤0.33×, 50 at 1×, 100 at ≥3×, log scale).Average of two halves. HR half: linear in log(multiple), 100 at ≤ 3×, 0 at ≥ 100×, 0 without effective HR. Revenue half: linear in log(revenue peer value), 0 at ≤ 0.33×, 50 at 1×, 100 at ≥ 3×; neutral 50 when the peer group falls back to the universe.
Momentum25%
45Momentum 44.5: m = 0.5·g7 −0.069 + 0.3·(ln(day jump 0.93) clamped ±1.5 = −0.072) + 0.2·g30 −0.103 = −0.077; 0 at ≤−0.7, 50 at 0, 100 at ≥1.1.m = 0.5·g7 + 0.3·ln(day jump, clamped ±1.5) + 0.2·g30; 0 at m ≤ −0.7, 50 at 0, 100 at ≥ 1.1. Neutral 50 when g7 or g30 is missing; a missing day jump counts as 0.
Divergence20%
0Divergence 0.0: d = g30 − p30 = 0.000; 0 at ≤0, 100 at ≥1.5.d = max(0, g30 − p30) when g30 > 0; 0 at d ≤ 0, 100 at d ≥ 1.5, linear.
Quality20%
94Quality 94.1: mean of days HR>0 100% → 100.0 (0 at ≤30%, 100 at ≥90%), largest day 4% of HR30 → 100.0 (0 at ≥60%, 100 at ≤15%), distance to peak 0.79 → 82.4 (0 at ≤0.25, 100 at ≥0.9).Average of: share of days with HR > 0 (0 at ≤ 30%, 100 at ≥ 90%), 1 − largest day ÷ HR30 (0 at ≥ 60%, 100 at ≤ 15%) and distance to peak (0 at ≤ 0.25, 100 at ≥ 0.9).

Penaltiesnone

No penalty applies — 10 rules checked, 3 wait for research data

Where the numbers come from
Revenue source
1 active child
DefiLlama adapter per child
Price and market cap
defillama / defillama
latest fetch
Scored on
November 11, 2026
as-of date of the last compute run
On-chain verified
not yet
not checked yet
Protocols behind this token1 at DefiLlama

Per protocol: DefiLlama's methodology text, the distribution type we read from it and the sentence that decided it. The token takes the type of the protocol that returns the most to holders.

  • SSV Network
    Staking Pool · Ethereum
    type mixed · source label
    “Token Burns: Pre-migration: SSV tokens burned to the zero address.”

    Value accruing to holders: SSV token burns pre-migration; ETH network fees distributed to cSSV stakers post-migration.

    Token Burns
    Pre-migration: SSV tokens burned to the zero address.
    Network Fees To cSSV Stakers
    Post-migration: network fees distributed in ETH to cSSV stakers.
    adapter on GitHub ↗