Buyback Radar

Spectra SPECTRA

Revenue fadingRank#65in Low payout▲1Score9

Revenue −80% over 30 days. Also: holders revenue goes to vote lockers, not a buyback.

Yield, Arbitrum, OP Mainnet, Base +9, 193 days of data

Low payout: less than $100k to holders in 30 days, or payouts on fewer than 8 of the 30 days (for a token that pays in cycles of a week or longer: more than one of the payouts its cycle predicts missed); ranked within this group

Market cap

$2.5M

price $0.00518 · 7d +54.5% · 30d +16.8%

FDV $3.8M (1.5× market cap)

source defillama

Counted per year

$5k

holders revenue of the last 30 days, $873, × 365 ÷ 30, × type factor 0.5 (payouts to vote lockers count 50%)

ve / bribesbuyback share 100%

Pays out 0.4% of its market cap a year, using 100¢ of every $1 it earns.

Not a buyback: counts for 50% in the multiple (type factor 0.5), so the denominator is $5k instead of $11k.

Multiple

475×

median of all tokens 20.0×, against 475× here

Run-rate

496×

last 7 days $196 × 52 × 0.5 (type factor) = $5k a year

last week's payout in line with the 30-day pace

What we checked

  1. Valuation

    Multiple 475× (type factor 0.5: payouts to vote lockers count 50%), 23.8× more expensive than the median of all tokens (20.0×; its category is too small for a peer group). The group's largest earner Hyperliquid trades at 21.1×: 22.5× dearer per dollar returned to holders. On total revenue: 238×, 6.9× dearer than the revenue peer median.

  2. Distribution

    ve / bribes: Includes bribes and vote incentives from third parties paid to vote-escrow lockers; no buy pressure on the token. Holders got $873 of $873 revenue in 30 days → buyback share 100%. DefiLlama: “Yield Trading Fees To Holders: Yield trading fees distributed to veSPECTRA holders.”

  3. Sustainability

    Holders were paid on 30 of 30 days (100%); largest single day 21% of the month's holders revenue; paid to holders this week: 7% of the best week in 90 days (more than half below peak). Revenue −47% over 7 days and −80% over 30 days, price +17% over 30 days.

What this does not tell you

The figures come from DefiLlama's adapter for each child protocol. Only a few tokens have an on-chain check (see How the buyback really works); for the rest, whether the tokens were really bought, burned or parked in a treasury wallet is not checked here. Unlocks count where DefiLlama or our research has a vesting schedule; team discretion and liquidity depth only once researched.

Flags

  • Payout >50% below peakthis week's holders revenue is 7% of its best week in the last 90 days ($3k)
  • Small peer group51 peers in universe; median taken from the universe level

How the buyback really works

Not researched yet. Everything above comes from DefiLlama and market data only.

Holders revenue / revenue (30d)
$873 / $873
last 30 closed days
To holders
Pays out 0.4% of its market cap a year
FDV / dilution
$3.8M / 1.5×
FDV ÷ market cap
Price 7d / 30d
+54.5% / +16.8%
Revenue growth 7d / 30d
−47% / −80%
versus the period before
Divergence
0.00
revenue growth minus price growth, 30d
DEX liquidity
$47k
DexScreener, representative pools
24h volume
$6k
all markets, CoinGecko
Unlocks 30d
—
DefiLlama's schedule does not cover the next 30 days while tokens are still locked
Revenue multiple
238×
market cap ÷ revenue per year
Fee multiple
142×
market cap ÷ fees per year
Distance to peak
7%
this week ÷ best week of 90 days
Data since
May 4
first day with holders revenue

Holders revenue and price

Holders revenue per day7-day averagePrice (right axis)

Multiple over time

today 475× (scored) · peer median 20.0×

Market cap at close ÷ (holders revenue of the previous 30 days × 365 ÷ 30), with holders revenue capped at revenue and × the type factor: the same effective multiple as the peer median. Values above 100× are drawn at the top. Bands as on the meter; dashed line = peer median today.

Signal history

No signals for this token yet.

Versus peers

universe (whole universe) · 52 tokens (51 with a multiple) · median multiple 20.0× · Hyperliquid is valued 6996.8× higher. Per dollar that counts for holders, Spectra is 22.5× dearer.

Main-ranking peers only. Multiples count holders revenue capped at revenue, × the type factor (buyback 1 · buyback + burn 1 · burn 0.75 · mixed 0.75 · distribution 0.5 · unclear 0.5 · ve-distribution 0.25).

This token against its main-ranking peers: multiple, revenue multiple, buyback share, holders revenue, market cap and revenue growth
TokenDistributionMultipleRevenue multipleBuyback shareTo holders 30dMarket capRev. growth 30d
Pharaoh Exchangeve / bribes0.3×0.2×100%$1.3M$2.4M−53%
PaperStrategyBuyback + burn0.3×0.1×43%$743k$2.8M−2%
OTCBuyback + burn0.5×0.2×43%$284k$1.6M+99%
RamsesXMixed0.7×0.5×90%$347k$2.2M+8%
nestDistribution0.8×0.4×100%$868k$4.3M+30%
ORE ProtocolBuyback + burn1.0×1.0×99%$4.2M$50.2M+31%
StonkFunBuyback + burn1.8×1.1×60%$1.6M$36.7M−88%
upve / bribes2.0×1.0×100%$300k$3.7M−70%
Fake World AssetsBuyback + burn2.3×1.6×80%$142k$3.5M−72%
THORSwapMixed3.4×1.9×75%$311k$9.7M+37%
MarinadeBuyback5.0×2.5×50%$191k$11.7M−14%
ChainflipBuyback + burn5.6×5.6×100%$536k$36.3M+56%
PonsBuyback + burn6.1×6.1×104%$1.4M$101.8M−83%
PumpBuyback6.1×2.7×44%$21.5M$1.6B−27%
UsualMixed6.5×3.4×70%$372k$22.1M+72%
Aerove / bribes8.2×3.8×96%$7.4M$352.3M−8%
Tornado CashMixed9.7×7.3×100%$260k$23.1M−30%
SSV NetworkMixed12.1×9.1×100%$271k$30.0M−12%
SparkBuyback13.0×3.7×28%$344k$54.5M+144%
LighterBuyback15.8×12.8×81%$4.4M$841.1M+12%
edgeXBuyback16.4×7.1×43%$605k$120.4M−44%
GeodnetBuyback + burn18.7×14.9×80%$746k$169.4M0%
LidoBuyback18.8×7.1×37%$0$257.1M−5%
BankrDistribution19.3×8.5×86%$190k$23.9M−85%
ApeX ProtocolMixed19.3×14.5×100%$148k$26.1M−20%
deBridgeBuyback20.0×15.3×77%$352k$85.6M−12%
PancakeSwapBuyback + burn21.0×13.7×65%$2.4M$602.4M−29%
HyperliquidleaderBuyback + burn21.1×21.1×100%$68.7M$17.66B−4%
Yield Basisve / bribes22.6×8.0×100%$148k$14.3M41.0×
RaydiumBuyback27.2×16.9×62%$1.3M$421.9M−65%
SkyMixed27.3×8.5×41%$5.5M$1.37B−2%
Curve Financeve / bribes30.7×11.1×94%$2.6M$376.7M+44%
Maple FinanceBuyback35.9×7.2×20%$317k$138.2M+6%
UniswapBuyback + burn36.2×36.2×100%$8.2M$3.59B−19%
GMXDistribution37.2×13.6×73%$363k$82.1M+15%
Collector CryptBuyback + burn38.3×1.0×3%$380k$176.8M−5%
Convex Financeve / bribes46.5×13.8×95%$866k$153.1M−4%
AsterBuyback + burn51.2×∞—$2.7M$1.71B—
OrcaBuyback52.8×8.1×15%$120k$77.1M−37%
dYdXDistribution54.8×27.4×100%$234k$77.9M−21%
JupiterBuyback55.3×16.6×30%$1.3M$891.3M−32%
VeniceBuyback + burn68.9×68.9×100%$1.1M$946.3M+21%
KinetiqMixed77.8×34.3×59%$133k$94.7M−37%
RailgunDistribution80.5×25.7×65%$202k$108.6M−9%
Pendleve / bribes105×37.5×71%$421k$268.9M+41%
Render Network BMEBurn125×89.1×95%$753k$859.5M+242%
ChainlinkBuyback139×119×100%$5.3M$7.74B+23%
MeteoraDistribution162×4.8×17%$480k$166.1M−54%
NEAR ProtocolBuyback210×198×95%$1.8M$4.69B−18%
Spectrathis tokenve / bribes475×238×100%$873$2.5M−80%
LiquityDistribution1.2k×8.4×81%$128k$16.2M+418%
BONK.funMixed∞12.0×95%$1.5M$240.1M−67%
Score build-up9 of 100

Total score = 35% valuation + 25% momentum + 20% divergence + 20% quality − penalties, clamped to 0–100. Every number here can be recomputed from the figures on this page.

9of 100#65▲1top 86%
Valuation 0.0Momentum 6.6Divergence 0.0Quality 12.5penalties −10= 9.1
Valuation35%
0Valuation 0.0: HR half 0.0 (multiple 475.17×; 100 at ≤3×, 0 at ≥100×, log scale), revenue half 0.0 (revenue peer value 0.15×; 0 at ≤0.33×, 50 at 1×, 100 at ≥3×, log scale).Average of two halves. HR half: linear in log(multiple), 100 at ≤ 3×, 0 at ≥ 100×, 0 without effective HR. Revenue half: linear in log(revenue peer value), 0 at ≤ 0.33×, 50 at 1×, 100 at ≥ 3×; neutral 50 when the peer group falls back to the universe.
Momentum25%capped
2627 before the peak capMomentum 26.5: m = 0.5·g7 −0.633 + 0.3·(ln(day jump 2.61) clamped ±1.5 = 0.959) + 0.2·g30 −1.500 = −0.329; 0 at ≤−0.7, 50 at 0, 100 at ≥1.1.m = 0.5·g7 + 0.3·ln(day jump, clamped ±1.5) + 0.2·g30; 0 at m ≤ −0.7, 50 at 0, 100 at ≥ 1.1. Neutral 50 when g7 or g30 is missing; a missing day jump counts as 0.
Divergence20%capped
0Divergence 0.0: d = g30 − p30 = 0.000; 0 at ≤0, 100 at ≥1.5.d = max(0, g30 − p30) when g30 > 0; 0 at d ≤ 0, 100 at d ≥ 1.5, linear.
Quality20%
62Quality 62.3: mean of days HR>0 100% → 100.0 (0 at ≤30%, 100 at ≥90%), largest day 21% of HR30 → 86.9 (0 at ≥60%, 100 at ≤15%), distance to peak 0.07 → 0.0 (0 at ≤0.25, 100 at ≥0.9).Average of: share of days with HR > 0 (0 at ≤ 30%, 100 at ≥ 90%), 1 − largest day ÷ HR30 (0 at ≥ 60%, 100 at ≤ 15%) and distance to peak (0 at ≤ 0.25, 100 at ≥ 0.9).
  • Penalty −10 (low_liquidity): DEX liquidity $47k below $250k and 24h volume $6k below $1.00M.

HR7 is below 50% of its 90-day peak: momentum and divergence are capped at 50. This is not a penalty; the distance already counts in quality.

Penalties−10

−10Liquidity below $250k (dex) or 24h volume below $1M (cex)DEX liquidity $47k below $250k and 24h volume $6k below $1.00M

9 rules not applied, 3 wait for research data.

Where the numbers come from
Revenue source
1 active child
DefiLlama adapter per child
Price and market cap
defillama / defillama
latest fetch
Scored on
November 12, 2026
as-of date of the last compute run
On-chain verified
not yet
not checked yet
Protocols behind this token1 at DefiLlama

Per protocol: DefiLlama's methodology text, the distribution type we read from it and the sentence that decided it. The token takes the type of the protocol that returns the most to holders.

  • Spectra V2
    Yield · Arbitrum, OP Mainnet, Base, Ethereum, Sonic, Hemi, Avalanche, BSC, Hyperliquid L1, Katana, Flare, Monad
    type ve-distribution · source label
    “Yield Trading Fees To Holders: Yield trading fees distributed to veSPECTRA holders.”

    Yield trading fees, voting fees, and voting incentives distributed to veSPECTRA holders.

    Voting Fees
    Voting fee rewards distributed to veSPECTRA holders.
    Voting Incentives
    Voting incentives distributed to veSPECTRA holders.
    Yield Trading Fees To Holders
    Yield trading fees distributed to veSPECTRA holders.
    adapter on GitHub ↗