River RIVER

Revenue fadingRank#34in Low payout▼1Score28

Revenue −69% over 30 days. Also: holders revenue is paid out, not a buyback.

CeDeFi, BOB, BSquared, Bitlayer +5, 193 days of data

Low payout: less than $100k to holders in 30 days, or payouts on fewer than 8 of the 30 days (for a token that pays in cycles of a week or longer: more than one of the payouts its cycle predicts missed); ranked within this group

Market cap

$29.9M

price $0.742 · 7d +0.3% · 30d −34.9%

FDV $74.4M (2.5× market cap)

source defillama

Counted per year

$33

holders revenue of the last 30 days, $5, × 365 ÷ 30 (capped at revenue; before the cap $13), × type factor 0.5 (payouts count 50%)

Distributionbuyback share 100%

Pays out 0.0% of its market cap a year, using 100¢ of every $1 it earns.

Not a buyback: counts for 50% in the multiple (type factor 0.5), so the denominator is $33 instead of $66.

Multiple

884.6k×

median of all tokens 19.9×, against 884.6k× here

Run-rate

106.1k×

last 7 days $11 × 52 × 0.5 (type factor) = $277 a year

last week's payout to holders ran 8.3× the 30-day pace: the payout is speeding up

What we checked

Valuation
Multiple 884.6k× (type factor 0.5: payouts count 50%), 44.6k× more expensive than the median of all tokens (19.9×; its category is too small for a peer group). The group's largest earner Hyperliquid trades at 21.4×: 41.4k× dearer per dollar returned to holders. On total revenue: 184.8k×, 10.2k× dearer than the revenue peer median.
Distribution
Distribution: Revenue is paid out to stakers or holders (often in another asset); no buy pressure on the token. Holders got $13 of $13 revenue in 30 days → buyback share 100%. DefiLlama: “Borrow Fees: Borrow fees distributed to satUSD stability pool and satUSD+ holders.”
Sustainability
Holders were paid on 10 of 30 days (33%); largest single day 74% of the month's holders revenue (one day carries the month, so the multiple is not a steady pace); paid to holders this week: 35% of the best week in 90 days (more than half below peak). Revenue 29.6× over 7 days and −69% over 30 days, price −35% over 30 days.

What this does not tell you

The figures come from DefiLlama's adapter for each child protocol. Only a few tokens have an on-chain check (see How the buyback really works); for the rest, whether the tokens were really bought, burned or parked in a treasury wallet is not checked here. Unlocks count where DefiLlama or our research has a vesting schedule; team discretion and liquidity depth only once researched.

Flags

One-day spikeone day made 74% of the 30-day holders revenue. The multiple does not show a steady pace, so the token stays out of the Cheap lens and buy signals
Payout >50% below peakthis week's holders revenue is 35% of its best week in the last 90 days ($31)
Small peer group51 peers in universe; median taken from the universe level

How the buyback really works

Not researched yet. Everything above comes from DefiLlama and market data only.

Holders revenue / revenue (30d): $13 / $13; last 30 closed days
To holders: Pays out 0.0% of its market cap a year
FDV / dilution: $74.4M / 2.5×; FDV ÷ market cap
Price 7d / 30d: +0.3% / −34.9%
Revenue growth 7d / 30d: 29.6× / −69%; versus the period before
Divergence: 0.00; revenue growth minus price growth, 30d
DEX liquidity: $189k; DexScreener, representative pools
24h volume: $2.7M; all markets, CoinGecko
Unlocks 30d: —; DefiLlama's schedule does not cover the next 30 days while tokens are still locked
Revenue multiple: 184.8k×; market cap ÷ revenue per year
Fee multiple: 184.8k×; market cap ÷ fees per year
Distance to peak: 35%; this week ÷ best week of 90 days
Data since: May 4; first day with holders revenue

Holders revenue and price

Holders revenue per day7-day averagePrice (right axis)

Multiple over time

today 884.6k× (scored) · peer median 19.9×

Market cap at close ÷ (holders revenue of the previous 30 days × 365 ÷ 30), with holders revenue capped at revenue and × the type factor: the same effective multiple as the peer median. Values above 100× are drawn at the top. Bands as on the meter; dashed line = peer median today.

Signal history

No signals for this token yet.

Versus peers

universe (whole universe) · 52 tokens (51 with a multiple) · median multiple 19.9× · Hyperliquid is valued 589.8× higher. Per dollar that counts for holders, River is 41398.2× dearer.

Main-ranking peers only. Multiples count holders revenue capped at revenue, × the type factor (buyback 1 · buyback + burn 1 · burn 0.75 · mixed 0.75 · distribution 0.5 · unclear 0.5 · ve-distribution 0.25).

This token against its main-ranking peers: multiple, revenue multiple, buyback share, holders revenue, market cap and revenue growth
Token	Distribution	Multiple	Revenue multiple	Buyback share	To holders 30d	Market cap	Rev. growth 30d
Pharaoh Exchange	ve / bribes	0.3×	0.2×	100%	$1.3M	$2.4M	−53%
PaperStrategy	Buyback + burn	0.3×	0.1×	43%	$743k	$2.8M	−2%
OTC	Buyback + burn	0.5×	0.2×	43%	$284k	$1.6M	+99%
RamsesX	Mixed	0.7×	0.5×	90%	$347k	$2.2M	+8%
nest	Distribution	0.8×	0.4×	100%	$868k	$4.3M	+30%
ORE Protocol	Buyback + burn	1.0×	1.0×	99%	$4.2M	$50.2M	+31%
StonkFun	Buyback + burn	1.9×	1.1×	60%	$1.6M	$36.7M	−88%
up	ve / bribes	2.0×	1.0×	100%	$300k	$3.7M	−70%
Fake World Assets	Buyback + burn	2.3×	1.6×	80%	$142k	$3.5M	−72%
THORSwap	Mixed	3.4×	1.9×	75%	$311k	$9.7M	+37%
Marinade	Buyback	5.0×	2.5×	50%	$191k	$11.7M	−14%
Chainflip	Buyback + burn	5.6×	5.6×	100%	$536k	$36.3M	+56%
Pons	Buyback + burn	6.2×	6.2×	104%	$1.4M	$101.8M	−83%
Pump	Buyback	6.2×	2.7×	44%	$21.5M	$1.6B	−27%
Usual	Mixed	6.5×	3.4×	70%	$372k	$22.1M	+72%
Aero	ve / bribes	8.0×	3.7×	96%	$7.4M	$352.3M	−8%
Tornado Cash	Mixed	9.7×	7.3×	100%	$260k	$23.1M	−30%
SSV Network	Mixed	12.1×	9.1×	100%	$271k	$30.0M	−12%
Spark	Buyback	12.9×	3.6×	28%	$344k	$54.5M	+144%
Lighter	Buyback	15.4×	12.4×	81%	$4.4M	$841.1M	+12%
edgeX	Buyback	16.3×	7.0×	43%	$605k	$120.4M	−44%
Lido	Buyback	18.5×	7.0×	37%	$0	$257.1M	−5%
Geodnet	Buyback + burn	18.6×	14.9×	80%	$746k	$169.4M	0%
Bankr	Distribution	19.2×	8.4×	86%	$190k	$23.9M	−85%
ApeX Protocol	Mixed	19.4×	14.5×	100%	$148k	$26.1M	−20%
deBridge	Buyback	19.9×	15.2×	77%	$352k	$85.6M	−12%
PancakeSwap	Buyback + burn	20.9×	13.6×	65%	$2.4M	$602.4M	−29%
Hyperliquidleader	Buyback + burn	21.4×	21.4×	100%	$68.7M	$17.66B	−4%
Yield Basis	ve / bribes	22.4×	7.9×	100%	$148k	$14.3M	41.0×
Raydium	Buyback	27.0×	16.7×	62%	$1.3M	$421.9M	−65%
Sky	Mixed	27.0×	8.4×	41%	$5.5M	$1.37B	−2%
Curve Finance	ve / bribes	30.5×	11.1×	94%	$2.6M	$376.7M	+44%
Maple Finance	Buyback	35.5×	7.1×	20%	$317k	$138.2M	+6%
Uniswap	Buyback + burn	36.6×	36.6×	100%	$8.2M	$3.59B	−19%
GMX	Distribution	37.0×	13.5×	73%	$363k	$82.1M	+15%
Collector Crypt	Buyback + burn	37.5×	1.0×	3%	$380k	$176.8M	−5%
Convex Finance	ve / bribes	45.8×	13.6×	95%	$866k	$153.1M	−4%
Aster	Buyback + burn	51.1×	∞	—	$2.7M	$1.71B	—
Orca	Buyback	52.2×	8.1×	15%	$120k	$77.1M	−37%
dYdX	Distribution	53.9×	27.0×	100%	$234k	$77.9M	−21%
Jupiter	Buyback	54.2×	16.2×	30%	$1.3M	$891.3M	−32%
Venice	Buyback + burn	68.2×	68.2×	100%	$1.1M	$946.3M	+21%
Kinetiq	Mixed	77.6×	34.2×	59%	$133k	$94.7M	−37%
Railgun	Distribution	80.3×	25.6×	65%	$202k	$108.6M	−9%
Pendle	ve / bribes	102×	36.5×	71%	$421k	$268.9M	+41%
Render Network BME	Burn	124×	88.2×	95%	$753k	$859.5M	+242%
Chainlink	Buyback	139×	119×	100%	$5.3M	$7.74B	+23%
Meteora	Distribution	161×	4.7×	17%	$480k	$166.1M	−54%
NEAR Protocol	Buyback	212×	200×	95%	$1.8M	$4.69B	−18%
Liquity	Distribution	1.2k×	8.3×	81%	$128k	$16.2M	+418%
Riverthis token	Distribution	884.6k×	184.8k×	100%	$13	$29.9M	−69%
BONK.fun	Mixed	∞	11.9×	95%	$1.5M	$240.1M	−67%

Score build-up28 of 100

Total score = 35% valuation + 25% momentum + 20% divergence + 20% quality − penalties, clamped to 0–100. Every number here can be recomputed from the figures on this page.

28of 100#34▼1top 45% one or more parts are the neutral 50

Valuation 8.8Momentum 12.5Divergence 10.0Quality 1.4penalties −5= 27.6

Valuation35%

25Valuation 25.0: HR half 0.0 (multiple 884641.87×; 100 at ≤3×, 0 at ≥100×, log scale), revenue half 50.0 (revenue peer group fell back to the universe → neutral 50; 0 at ≤0.33×, 50 at 1×, 100 at ≥3×, log scale).Average of two halves. HR half: linear in log(multiple), 100 at ≤ 3×, 0 at ≥ 100×, 0 without effective HR. Revenue half: linear in log(revenue peer value), 0 at ≤ 0.33×, 50 at 1×, 100 at ≥ 3×; neutral 50 when the peer group falls back to the universe.

Momentum25%capped

50Momentum 53.0: m = 0.5·g7 1.500 + 0.3·(ln(day jump 0.00) clamped ±1.5 = −1.500) + 0.2·g30 −1.167 = 0.067; 0 at ≤−0.7, 50 at 0, 100 at ≥1.1.m = 0.5·g7 + 0.3·ln(day jump, clamped ±1.5) + 0.2·g30; 0 at m ≤ −0.7, 50 at 0, 100 at ≥ 1.1. Neutral 50 when g7 or g30 is missing; a missing day jump counts as 0.

Divergence20%capped

50Divergence 0.0: d = g30 − p30 = 0.000; 0 at ≤0, 100 at ≥1.5.d = max(0, g30 − p30) when g30 > 0; 0 at d ≤ 0, 100 at d ≥ 1.5, linear.

Quality20%

7Quality 6.8: mean of days HR>0 33% → 5.6 (0 at ≤30%, 100 at ≥90%), largest day 74% of HR30 → 0.0 (0 at ≥60%, 100 at ≤15%), distance to peak 0.35 → 14.8 (0 at ≤0.25, 100 at ≥0.9).Average of: share of days with HR > 0 (0 at ≤ 30%, 100 at ≥ 90%), 1 − largest day ÷ HR30 (0 at ≥ 60%, 100 at ≤ 15%) and distance to peak (0 at ≤ 0.25, 100 at ≥ 0.9).

One-day spike: largest day 74% of the HR window: Momentum 53.0 → 50, Divergence 0.0 → 50.
Penalty −5 (dilution_above_2): dilution ratio 2.54 above 2.

HR7 is below 50% of its 90-day peak: momentum and divergence are capped at 50. This is not a penalty; the distance already counts in quality.

Penalties−5

−5Dilution ratio above 2dilution ratio 2.54 above 2

9 rules not applied, 3 wait for research data.

Where the numbers come from

Revenue source: 1 active child; DefiLlama adapter per child
Price and market cap: defillama / defillama; latest fetch
Scored on: November 12, 2026; as-of date of the last compute run
On-chain verified: not yet; not checked yet

Protocols behind this token1 at DefiLlama

Per protocol: DefiLlama's methodology text, the distribution type we read from it and the sentence that decided it. The token takes the type of the protocol that returns the most to holders.

River Omni-CDP
CeDeFi · BOB, BSquared, Bitlayer, BSC, Hemi, Base, Arbitrum, Ethereum
type distribution · source label
“Borrow Fees: Borrow fees distributed to satUSD stability pool and satUSD+ holders.”
River: Fees to satUSD stability pool and satUSD+ holders. NYM: Swap fees to debtToken stakers.
Borrow Fees
Borrow fees distributed to satUSD stability pool and satUSD+ holders.
Redemption Fees
Redemption fees distributed to satUSD stability pool and satUSD+ holders.
NYM Swap In Fees
Swap in fees distributed to debtToken stakers via RewardManager.
NYM Swap Out Fees
Swap out fees distributed to debtToken stakers via RewardManager.
adapter on GitHub ↗