Buyback Radar

Rain RAIN

Expensive

No buybacks in the last 30 days: nothing is bought back for the market cap.

Prediction Market, Arbitrum, 180 days of data

Not ranked: nothing returned to holders in the last 30 days (effective holders revenue $0)

Market cap

$2.67B

price $0.00374 · 7d −39.2% · 30d −62.6%

FDV $4.28B (1.6× market cap)

source defillama

Buyback revenue / year

$0

holders revenue of the last 30 days, $0, × 365 ÷ 30

Buyback + burnbuyback share n/a

Nothing went to holders in the last 30 days.

Multiple

∞

no effective holders revenue: nothing flows back to holders, so the multiple is unbounded

Run-rate

∞

last 7 days $0 × 52 = $0 a year

What we checked

  1. Valuation

    No effective holders revenue, so the multiple is ∞: nothing to value the token on.

  2. Distribution

    Buyback + burn: Revenue buys the token on the market and the bought tokens are burned. Holders got $0 of $0 revenue in 30 days. DefiLlama: “Platform Fees: PlatformClaim fees only; burned directly when denominated in RAIN, used for RAIN buybacks when in USDT.”

  3. Sustainability

    Holders were paid on 0 of 30 days (0%); largest single day — of the month's holders revenue; paid to holders this week: 0% of the best week in 90 days (more than half below peak). Revenue — over 7 days and — over 30 days, price −63% over 30 days.

What this does not tell you

The figures come from DefiLlama's adapter for each child protocol. Only a few tokens have an on-chain check (see How the buyback really works); for the rest, whether the tokens were really bought, burned or parked in a treasury wallet is not checked here. Unlocks count where DefiLlama or our research has a vesting schedule; team discretion and liquidity depth only once researched.

Flags

  • Payout >50% below peakthis week's holders revenue is 0% of its best week in the last 90 days ($76k)
  • Insufficient history179 days of data; g7, g30, day_jump, divergence not computable yet and scored as neutral 50
  • Small peer group51 peers in universe; median taken from the universe level

How the buyback really works

Not researched yet. Everything above comes from DefiLlama and market data only.

Holders revenue / revenue (30d)
$0 / $0
last 30 closed days
To holders
Nothing went to holders in the last 30 days
FDV / dilution
$4.28B / 1.6×
FDV ÷ market cap
Price 7d / 30d
−39.2% / −62.6%
Revenue growth 7d / 30d
— / —
versus the period before
Divergence
—
revenue growth minus price growth, 30d
DEX liquidity
$180k
DexScreener, representative pools
24h volume
$17.9M
all markets, CoinGecko
Unlocks 30d
—
DefiLlama's schedule does not cover the next 30 days while tokens are still locked
Revenue multiple
∞
market cap ÷ revenue per year
Fee multiple
∞
market cap ÷ fees per year
Distance to peak
0%
this week ÷ best week of 90 days
Data since
May 17
first day with holders revenue

Holders revenue and price

Holders revenue per day7-day averagePrice (right axis)

Multiple over time

today ∞ (scored) · peer median 19.6×

Market cap at close ÷ (holders revenue of the previous 30 days × 365 ÷ 30), with holders revenue capped at revenue and × the type factor: the same effective multiple as the peer median. Values above 100× are drawn at the top. Bands as on the meter; dashed line = peer median today.

Signal history

No signals for this token yet.

Versus peers

universe (whole universe) · 52 tokens (51 with a multiple) · median multiple 19.6×

Main-ranking peers only. Multiples count holders revenue capped at revenue, × the type factor (buyback 1 · buyback + burn 1 · burn 0.75 · mixed 0.75 · distribution 0.5 · unclear 0.5 · ve-distribution 0.25).

This token against its main-ranking peers: multiple, revenue multiple, buyback share, holders revenue, market cap and revenue growth
TokenDistributionMultipleRevenue multipleBuyback shareTo holders 30dMarket capRev. growth 30d
Pharaoh Exchangeve / bribes0.3×0.2×100%$1.3M$2.4M−53%
PaperStrategyBuyback + burn0.3×0.1×43%$743k$2.8M−2%
OTCBuyback + burn0.5×0.2×43%$284k$1.6M+99%
RamsesXMixed0.7×0.5×90%$347k$2.2M+8%
nestDistribution0.8×0.4×100%$868k$4.3M+30%
ORE ProtocolBuyback + burn1.0×1.0×99%$4.2M$50.2M+31%
StonkFunBuyback + burn1.9×1.1×60%$1.6M$36.7M−88%
upve / bribes2.0×1.0×100%$300k$3.7M−70%
Fake World AssetsBuyback + burn2.3×1.6×80%$142k$3.5M−72%
THORSwapMixed3.4×1.9×75%$311k$9.7M+37%
MarinadeBuyback5.0×2.5×50%$191k$11.7M−14%
ChainflipBuyback + burn5.6×5.6×100%$536k$36.3M+56%
PonsBuyback + burn6.2×6.2×104%$1.4M$101.8M−83%
PumpBuyback6.2×2.7×44%$21.5M$1.6B−27%
UsualMixed6.5×3.4×70%$372k$22.1M+72%
Aerove / bribes8.0×3.7×96%$7.4M$352.3M−8%
Tornado CashMixed9.7×7.3×100%$260k$23.1M−30%
SSV NetworkMixed12.1×9.1×100%$271k$30.0M−12%
SparkBuyback12.9×3.6×28%$344k$54.5M+144%
LighterBuyback15.4×12.4×81%$4.4M$841.1M+12%
edgeXBuyback16.3×7.0×43%$605k$120.4M−44%
LidoBuyback18.5×7.0×37%$0$257.1M−5%
GeodnetBuyback + burn18.6×14.9×80%$746k$169.4M0%
BankrDistribution19.2×8.4×86%$190k$23.9M−85%
ApeX ProtocolMixed19.4×14.5×100%$148k$26.1M−20%
deBridgeBuyback19.9×15.2×77%$352k$85.6M−12%
PancakeSwapBuyback + burn20.9×13.6×65%$2.4M$602.4M−29%
HyperliquidleaderBuyback + burn21.4×21.4×100%$68.7M$17.66B−4%
Yield Basisve / bribes22.4×7.9×100%$148k$14.3M41.0×
RaydiumBuyback27.0×16.7×62%$1.3M$421.9M−65%
SkyMixed27.0×8.4×41%$5.5M$1.37B−2%
Curve Financeve / bribes30.5×11.1×94%$2.6M$376.7M+44%
Maple FinanceBuyback35.5×7.1×20%$317k$138.2M+6%
UniswapBuyback + burn36.6×36.6×100%$8.2M$3.59B−19%
GMXDistribution37.0×13.5×73%$363k$82.1M+15%
Collector CryptBuyback + burn37.5×1.0×3%$380k$176.8M−5%
Convex Financeve / bribes45.8×13.6×95%$866k$153.1M−4%
AsterBuyback + burn51.1×∞—$2.7M$1.71B—
OrcaBuyback52.2×8.1×15%$120k$77.1M−37%
dYdXDistribution53.9×27.0×100%$234k$77.9M−21%
JupiterBuyback54.2×16.2×30%$1.3M$891.3M−32%
VeniceBuyback + burn68.2×68.2×100%$1.1M$946.3M+21%
KinetiqMixed77.6×34.2×59%$133k$94.7M−37%
RailgunDistribution80.3×25.6×65%$202k$108.6M−9%
Pendleve / bribes102×36.5×71%$421k$268.9M+41%
Render Network BMEBurn124×88.2×95%$753k$859.5M+242%
ChainlinkBuyback139×119×100%$5.3M$7.74B+23%
MeteoraDistribution161×4.7×17%$480k$166.1M−54%
NEAR ProtocolBuyback212×200×95%$1.8M$4.69B−18%
LiquityDistribution1.2k×8.3×81%$128k$16.2M+418%
BONK.funMixed∞11.9×95%$1.5M$240.1M−67%
Rainthis tokenBuyback + burn∞∞—$0$2.67B—
Score build-up0 of 100

Total score = 35% valuation + 25% momentum + 20% divergence + 20% quality − penalties, clamped to 0–100. Every number here can be recomputed from the figures on this page.

0of 100 one or more parts are the neutral 50
Valuation 0.0Momentum 0.0Divergence 0.0Quality 0.0= 0.0
Valuation35%
0Valuation 0.0: HR half 0.0 (multiple n/a (effective HR 0) → 0; 100 at ≤3×, 0 at ≥100×, log scale), revenue half 0.0 (revenue peer value n/a (revenue multiple null) → 0; 0 at ≤0.33×, 50 at 1×, 100 at ≥3×, log scale).Average of two halves. HR half: linear in log(multiple), 100 at ≤ 3×, 0 at ≥ 100×, 0 without effective HR. Revenue half: linear in log(revenue peer value), 0 at ≤ 0.33×, 50 at 1×, 100 at ≥ 3×; neutral 50 when the peer group falls back to the universe.
Momentum25%capped
0Momentum 0.0 (neutral): g7 unknown, g30 unknown; missing history gives the neutral 0.m = 0.5·g7 + 0.3·ln(day jump, clamped ±1.5) + 0.2·g30; 0 at m ≤ −0.7, 50 at 0, 100 at ≥ 1.1. Neutral 50 when g7 or g30 is missing; a missing day jump counts as 0.
Divergence20%capped
0Divergence 0.0 (neutral): d unknown (missing history).d = max(0, g30 − p30) when g30 > 0; 0 at d ≤ 0, 100 at d ≥ 1.5, linear.
Quality20%
0Quality 0.0 (neutral): days HR>0 0%, largest day unknown, distance to peak 0.00; a missing part gives the neutral 0.Average of: share of days with HR > 0 (0 at ≤ 30%, 100 at ≥ 90%), 1 − largest day ÷ HR30 (0 at ≥ 60%, 100 at ≤ 15%) and distance to peak (0 at ≤ 0.25, 100 at ≥ 0.9).

HR7 is below 50% of its 90-day peak: momentum and divergence are capped at 50. This is not a penalty; the distance already counts in quality.

Penaltiesnone

No penalty applies — 10 rules checked, 3 wait for research data

Where the numbers come from
Revenue source
1 active child
DefiLlama adapter per child
Price and market cap
defillama / defillama
latest fetch
Scored on
November 12, 2026
as-of date of the last compute run
On-chain verified
not yet
not checked yet
Protocols behind this token1 at DefiLlama

Per protocol: DefiLlama's methodology text, the distribution type we read from it and the sentence that decided it. The token takes the type of the protocol that returns the most to holders.

  • Rain
    Prediction Market · Arbitrum
    type buyback-burn · source label
    “Platform Fees: PlatformClaim fees only; burned directly when denominated in RAIN, used for RAIN buybacks when in USDT.”

    Platform fees, burned directly when denominated in RAIN or used for RAIN buybacks when in USDT.

    Platform Fees
    PlatformClaim fees only; burned directly when denominated in RAIN, used for RAIN buybacks when in USDT.
    adapter on GitHub ↗