Buyback Radar

WOOFi WOO

Unclear use of revenue

DefiLlama’s methodology does not make clear whether holders revenue is bought back or paid out.

Dexs, BSC, Avalanche, Fantom +9, 193 days of data

Not ranked: nothing returned to holders in the last 30 days (effective holders revenue $0)

Market cap

$19.8M

price $0.0103 · 7d −11.9% · 30d −17.9%

FDV $19.5M (1.0× market cap)

source defillama

Counted per year

$0

holders revenue of the last 30 days, $0, × 365 ÷ 30, × type factor 0.5 (an unclear use counts 50%)

Unclearbuyback share 0%

Nothing went to holders in the last 30 days, using 0¢ of every $1 it earns.

Not a buyback: counts for 50% in the multiple (type factor 0.5), so the denominator is $0 instead of $0.

Multiple

∞

no effective holders revenue: nothing flows back to holders, so the multiple is unbounded

Run-rate

∞

last 7 days $0 × 52 × 0.5 (type factor) = $0 a year

What we checked

  1. Valuation

    No effective holders revenue, so the multiple is ∞: nothing to value the token on.

  2. Distribution

    Unclear: The DefiLlama methodology does not say where holders revenue goes. Holders got $0 of $9k revenue in 30 days → buyback share 0%. DefiLlama: “Money going to governance token holders”

  3. Sustainability

    Holders were paid on 0 of 30 days (0%); largest single day — of the month's holders revenue; paid to holders this week: 0% of the best week in 90 days (more than half below peak). Revenue +36% over 7 days and −13% over 30 days, price −18% over 30 days.

What this does not tell you

The figures come from DefiLlama's adapter for each child protocol. Only a few tokens have an on-chain check (see How the buyback really works); for the rest, whether the tokens were really bought, burned or parked in a treasury wallet is not checked here. Unlocks count where DefiLlama or our research has a vesting schedule; team discretion and liquidity depth only once researched.

Flags

  • Payout >50% below peakthis week's holders revenue is 0% of its best week in the last 90 days ($4k)
  • Data issue: chain mapping missingData issue (chain mapping missing): warning, scores are computed as usual

How the buyback really works

Not researched yet. Everything above comes from DefiLlama and market data only.

Holders revenue / revenue (30d)
$0 / $9k
last 30 closed days
To holders
Nothing went to holders in the last 30 days
FDV / dilution
$19.5M / 1.0×
FDV ÷ market cap
Price 7d / 30d
−11.9% / −17.9%
Revenue growth 7d / 30d
+36% / −13%
versus the period before
Divergence
0.00
revenue growth minus price growth, 30d
DEX liquidity
$1.3M
DexScreener, representative pools
24h volume
$1.2M
all markets, CoinGecko
Unlocks 30d
—
DefiLlama's schedule does not cover the next 30 days while tokens are still locked
Revenue multiple
187×
market cap ÷ revenue per year
Fee multiple
187×
market cap ÷ fees per year
Distance to peak
0%
this week ÷ best week of 90 days
Data since
May 4
first day with holders revenue

Holders revenue and price

Holders revenue per day7-day averagePrice (right axis)

Multiple over time

today ∞ (scored) · peer median 21.0×

Market cap at close ÷ (holders revenue of the previous 30 days × 365 ÷ 30), with holders revenue capped at revenue and × the type factor: the same effective multiple as the peer median. Values above 100× are drawn at the top. Bands as on the meter; dashed line = peer median today.

Signal history

No signals for this token yet.

Versus peers

Dexs · 14 tokens · median multiple 21.0×

Main-ranking peers only. Multiples count holders revenue capped at revenue, × the type factor (buyback 1 · buyback + burn 1 · burn 0.75 · mixed 0.75 · distribution 0.5 · unclear 0.5 · ve-distribution 0.25).

This token against its main-ranking peers: multiple, revenue multiple, buyback share, holders revenue, market cap and revenue growth
TokenDistributionMultipleRevenue multipleBuyback shareTo holders 30dMarket capRev. growth 30d
Pharaoh Exchangeve / bribes0.3×0.2×100%$1.3M$2.4M−53%
RamsesXMixed0.7×0.5×90%$347k$2.2M+8%
nestDistribution0.8×0.4×100%$868k$4.3M+30%
upve / bribes2.0×1.0×100%$300k$3.7M−70%
ChainflipBuyback + burn5.6×5.6×100%$536k$36.3M+56%
Aerove / bribes8.2×3.8×96%$7.4M$352.3M−8%
PancakeSwapBuyback + burn21.0×13.7×65%$2.4M$602.4M−29%
RaydiumBuyback27.2×16.9×62%$1.3M$421.9M−65%
Curve Financeve / bribes30.7×11.1×94%$2.6M$376.7M+44%
UniswapleaderBuyback + burn36.2×36.2×100%$8.2M$3.59B−19%
AsterBuyback + burn51.2×∞—$2.7M$1.71B—
OrcaBuyback52.8×8.1×15%$120k$77.1M−37%
MeteoraDistribution162×4.8×17%$480k$166.1M−54%
WOOFithis tokenUnclear∞187×0%$0$19.8M−13%
Score build-up9 of 100

Total score = 35% valuation + 25% momentum + 20% divergence + 20% quality − penalties, clamped to 0–100. Every number here can be recomputed from the figures on this page.

9of 100 one or more parts are the neutral 50
Valuation 0.0Momentum 9.4Divergence 0.0Quality 0.0= 9.4
Valuation35%
0Valuation 0.0: HR half 0.0 (multiple n/a (effective HR 0) → 0; 100 at ≤3×, 0 at ≥100×, log scale), revenue half 0.0 (revenue peer value 0.09×; 0 at ≤0.33×, 50 at 1×, 100 at ≥3×, log scale).Average of two halves. HR half: linear in log(multiple), 100 at ≤ 3×, 0 at ≥ 100×, 0 without effective HR. Revenue half: linear in log(revenue peer value), 0 at ≤ 0.33×, 50 at 1×, 100 at ≥ 3×; neutral 50 when the peer group falls back to the universe.
Momentum25%capped
3738 before the peak capMomentum 37.5: m = 0.5·g7 0.310 + 0.3·(ln(day jump 0.36) clamped ±1.5 = −1.009) + 0.2·g30 −0.140 = −0.176; 0 at ≤−0.7, 50 at 0, 100 at ≥1.1.m = 0.5·g7 + 0.3·ln(day jump, clamped ±1.5) + 0.2·g30; 0 at m ≤ −0.7, 50 at 0, 100 at ≥ 1.1. Neutral 50 when g7 or g30 is missing; a missing day jump counts as 0.
Divergence20%capped
0Divergence 0.0: d = g30 − p30 = 0.000; 0 at ≤0, 100 at ≥1.5.d = max(0, g30 − p30) when g30 > 0; 0 at d ≤ 0, 100 at d ≥ 1.5, linear.
Quality20%
0Quality 0.0 (neutral): days HR>0 0%, largest day unknown, distance to peak 0.00; a missing part gives the neutral 0.Average of: share of days with HR > 0 (0 at ≤ 30%, 100 at ≥ 90%), 1 − largest day ÷ HR30 (0 at ≥ 60%, 100 at ≤ 15%) and distance to peak (0 at ≤ 0.25, 100 at ≥ 0.9).

HR7 is below 50% of its 90-day peak: momentum and divergence are capped at 50. This is not a penalty; the distance already counts in quality.

Penaltiesnone

No penalty applies — 10 rules checked, 3 wait for research data

Where the numbers come from
Revenue source
2 active children
DefiLlama adapter per child
Price and market cap
defillama / defillama
latest fetch
Scored on
November 12, 2026
as-of date of the last compute run
On-chain verified
not yet
not checked yet
Protocols behind this token2 at DefiLlama

Per protocol: DefiLlama's methodology text, the distribution type we read from it and the sentence that decided it. The token takes the type of the protocol that returns the most to holders.

  • WooFi Pro Perps
    Interface · Orderly Network
    type unclear · source none

    No methodology text at DefiLlama.

    adapter on GitHub ↗
  • WOOFi Swap
    Dexs · BSC, Avalanche, Fantom, Polygon, Arbitrum, OP Mainnet, ZKsync Era, Linea, Base, Mantle, Sonic
    type unclear · source text
    “Money going to governance token holders”

    Money going to governance token holders

    adapter on GitHub ↗