WOOFi WOO
Unclear use of revenueDefiLlama’s methodology does not make clear whether holders revenue is bought back or paid out.
Dexs, BSC, Avalanche, Fantom +9, 193 days of data
Not ranked: nothing returned to holders in the last 30 days (effective holders revenue $0)
Market cap
$19.8M
price $0.0103 · 7d −11.9% · 30d −17.9%
FDV $19.5M (1.0× market cap)
source defillama
Counted per year
$0
holders revenue of the last 30 days, $0, × 365 ÷ 30, × type factor 0.5 (an unclear use counts 50%)
Nothing went to holders in the last 30 days, using 0¢ of every $1 it earns.
Not a buyback: counts for 50% in the multiple (type factor 0.5), so the denominator is $0 instead of $0.
Multiple
∞no effective holders revenue: nothing flows back to holders, so the multiple is unbounded
Run-rate
∞
last 7 days $0 × 52 × 0.5 (type factor) = $0 a year
What we checked
- Valuation
No effective holders revenue, so the multiple is ∞: nothing to value the token on.
- Distribution
Unclear: The DefiLlama methodology does not say where holders revenue goes. Holders got $0 of $9k revenue in 30 days → buyback share 0%. DefiLlama: “Money going to governance token holders”
- Sustainability
Holders were paid on 0 of 30 days (0%); largest single day — of the month's holders revenue; paid to holders this week: 0% of the best week in 90 days (more than half below peak). Revenue +36% over 7 days and −13% over 30 days, price −18% over 30 days.
What this does not tell you
The figures come from DefiLlama's adapter for each child protocol. Only a few tokens have an on-chain check (see How the buyback really works); for the rest, whether the tokens were really bought, burned or parked in a treasury wallet is not checked here. Unlocks count where DefiLlama or our research has a vesting schedule; team discretion and liquidity depth only once researched.
Flags
- Payout >50% below peakthis week's holders revenue is 0% of its best week in the last 90 days ($4k)
- Data issue: chain mapping missingData issue (chain mapping missing): warning, scores are computed as usual
How the buyback really works
Not researched yet. Everything above comes from DefiLlama and market data only.
- Holders revenue / revenue (30d)
- $0 / $9k
- last 30 closed days
- To holders
- Nothing went to holders in the last 30 days
- FDV / dilution
- $19.5M / 1.0×
- FDV ÷ market cap
- Price 7d / 30d
- −11.9% / −17.9%
- Revenue growth 7d / 30d
- +36% / −13%
- versus the period before
- Divergence
- 0.00
- revenue growth minus price growth, 30d
- DEX liquidity
- $1.3M
- DexScreener, representative pools
- 24h volume
- $1.2M
- all markets, CoinGecko
- Unlocks 30d
- —
- DefiLlama's schedule does not cover the next 30 days while tokens are still locked
- Revenue multiple
- 187×
- market cap ÷ revenue per year
- Fee multiple
- 187×
- market cap ÷ fees per year
- Distance to peak
- 0%
- this week ÷ best week of 90 days
- Data since
- May 4
- first day with holders revenue
Holders revenue and price
Multiple over time
Market cap at close ÷ (holders revenue of the previous 30 days × 365 ÷ 30), with holders revenue capped at revenue and × the type factor: the same effective multiple as the peer median. Values above 100× are drawn at the top. Bands as on the meter; dashed line = peer median today.
Signal history
No signals for this token yet.
Versus peers
Dexs · 14 tokens · median multiple 21.0×
Main-ranking peers only. Multiples count holders revenue capped at revenue, × the type factor (buyback 1 · buyback + burn 1 · burn 0.75 · mixed 0.75 · distribution 0.5 · unclear 0.5 · ve-distribution 0.25).
| Token | Distribution | Multiple | Revenue multiple | Buyback share | To holders 30d | Market cap | Rev. growth 30d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pharaoh Exchange | ve / bribes | 0.3× | 0.2× | 100% | $1.3M | $2.4M | −53% |
| RamsesX | Mixed | 0.7× | 0.5× | 90% | $347k | $2.2M | +8% |
| nest | Distribution | 0.8× | 0.4× | 100% | $868k | $4.3M | +30% |
| up | ve / bribes | 2.0× | 1.0× | 100% | $300k | $3.7M | −70% |
| Chainflip | Buyback + burn | 5.6× | 5.6× | 100% | $536k | $36.3M | +56% |
| Aero | ve / bribes | 8.2× | 3.8× | 96% | $7.4M | $352.3M | −8% |
| PancakeSwap | Buyback + burn | 21.0× | 13.7× | 65% | $2.4M | $602.4M | −29% |
| Raydium | Buyback | 27.2× | 16.9× | 62% | $1.3M | $421.9M | −65% |
| Curve Finance | ve / bribes | 30.7× | 11.1× | 94% | $2.6M | $376.7M | +44% |
| Uniswapleader | Buyback + burn | 36.2× | 36.2× | 100% | $8.2M | $3.59B | −19% |
| Aster | Buyback + burn | 51.2× | ∞ | — | $2.7M | $1.71B | — |
| Orca | Buyback | 52.8× | 8.1× | 15% | $120k | $77.1M | −37% |
| Meteora | Distribution | 162× | 4.8× | 17% | $480k | $166.1M | −54% |
| WOOFithis token | Unclear | ∞ | 187× | 0% | $0 | $19.8M | −13% |
Score build-up9 of 100
Total score = 35% valuation + 25% momentum + 20% divergence + 20% quality − penalties, clamped to 0–100. Every number here can be recomputed from the figures on this page.
HR7 is below 50% of its 90-day peak: momentum and divergence are capped at 50. This is not a penalty; the distance already counts in quality.
Penaltiesnone
No penalty applies — 10 rules checked, 3 wait for research data
Where the numbers come from
- Revenue source
- 2 active children
- DefiLlama adapter per child
- Price and market cap
- defillama / defillama
- latest fetch
- Scored on
- November 12, 2026
- as-of date of the last compute run
- On-chain verified
- not yet
- not checked yet
Protocols behind this token2 at DefiLlama
Per protocol: DefiLlama's methodology text, the distribution type we read from it and the sentence that decided it. The token takes the type of the protocol that returns the most to holders.
- WooFi Pro PerpsInterface · Orderly Networktype unclear · source none
No methodology text at DefiLlama.
adapter on GitHub ↗ - WOOFi SwapDexs · BSC, Avalanche, Fantom, Polygon, Arbitrum, OP Mainnet, ZKsync Era, Linea, Base, Mantle, Sonictype unclear · source text
“Money going to governance token holders”
Money going to governance token holders
adapter on GitHub ↗