Ekubo Protocol EKUBO

Payout off peakRank#41in Low payout▼2Score25

Paid to holders this week: 13% of the best week in 90 days ($4k against $32k), while revenue −8% over 30 days.

Dexs, Starknet, Ethereum, Robinhood Chain, 175 days of data

Low payout: less than $100k to holders in 30 days, or payouts on fewer than 8 of the 30 days (for a token that pays in cycles of a week or longer: more than one of the payouts its cycle predicts missed); ranked within this group

Market cap

$8.9M

price $0.897 · 7d −14.3% · 30d −45.6%

FDV $8.7M (1.0× market cap)

source defillama

Buyback revenue / year

$843k

holders revenue of the last 30 days, $69k, × 365 ÷ 30

Buyback + burnbuyback share 97%

Buys back 9.5% of its market cap a year, using 97¢ of every $1 it earns.

Multiple

10.5×

peer median 15.7× (Dexs, 14 tokens), against 10.5× here

Run-rate

42.1×

last 7 days $4k × 52 = $210k a year

last week's payout to holders ran at 25% of the 30-day pace: the payout is slowing

What we checked

Valuation
Multiple 10.5×, 1.5× cheaper than its Dexs peers (median 15.7×, 14 tokens). The group's largest earner Uniswap trades at 36.2×: 3.4× cheaper per dollar returned to holders. On total revenue: 10.2×, 1.7× cheaper than the revenue peer median.
Distribution
Buyback + burn: Revenue buys the token on the market and the bought tokens are burned. Holders got $69k of $72k revenue in 30 days → buyback share 97%. DefiLlama: “Amount of fees used to buy back and burn EKUBO tokens on Starknet.”
Sustainability
Holders were paid on 30 of 30 days (100%); largest single day 33% of the month's holders revenue; paid to holders this week: 13% of the best week in 90 days (more than half below peak). Revenue −86% over 7 days and −8% over 30 days, price −46% over 30 days.

What this does not tell you

The figures come from DefiLlama's adapter for each child protocol. Only a few tokens have an on-chain check (see How the buyback really works); for the rest, whether the tokens were really bought, burned or parked in a treasury wallet is not checked here. Unlocks count where DefiLlama or our research has a vesting schedule; team discretion and liquidity depth only once researched.

Flags

Payout >50% below peakthis week's holders revenue is 13% of its best week in the last 90 days ($32k)
Data issue: chain mapping missingData issue (chain mapping missing): warning, scores are computed as usual

How the buyback really works

Not researched yet. Everything above comes from DefiLlama and market data only.

Holders revenue / revenue (30d): $69k / $72k; last 30 closed days
To holders: Buys back 9.5% of its market cap a year
FDV / dilution: $8.7M / 1.0×; FDV ÷ market cap
Price 7d / 30d: −14.3% / −45.6%
Revenue growth 7d / 30d: −86% / −8%; versus the period before
Divergence: 0.00; revenue growth minus price growth, 30d
DEX liquidity: —; trades mainly on exchanges
24h volume: $53k; all markets, CoinGecko
Unlocks 30d: $0; 99% or more of the max supply already circulates
Revenue multiple: 10.2×; market cap ÷ revenue per year
Fee multiple: 2.2×; market cap ÷ fees per year
Distance to peak: 13%; this week ÷ best week of 90 days
Data since: May 22; first day with holders revenue

Holders revenue and price

Holders revenue per day7-day averagePrice (right axis)

Multiple over time

today 10.5× (scored) · peer median 15.7×

Market cap at close ÷ (holders revenue of the previous 30 days × 365 ÷ 30), with holders revenue capped at revenue and × the type factor: the same effective multiple as the peer median. Values above 100× are drawn at the top. Bands as on the meter; dashed line = peer median today.

Signal history

No signals for this token yet.

Versus peers

Dexs · 14 tokens · median multiple 15.7× · Uniswap is valued 405.6× higher. Per dollar that counts for holders, Ekubo Protocol is 3.4× cheaper.

Main-ranking peers only. Multiples count holders revenue capped at revenue, × the type factor (buyback 1 · buyback + burn 1 · burn 0.75 · mixed 0.75 · distribution 0.5 · unclear 0.5 · ve-distribution 0.25).

This token against its main-ranking peers: multiple, revenue multiple, buyback share, holders revenue, market cap and revenue growth
Token	Distribution	Multiple	Revenue multiple	Buyback share	To holders 30d	Market cap	Rev. growth 30d
Pharaoh Exchange	ve / bribes	0.3×	0.2×	100%	$1.3M	$2.4M	−53%
RamsesX	Mixed	0.7×	0.5×	90%	$347k	$2.2M	+8%
nest	Distribution	0.8×	0.4×	100%	$868k	$4.3M	+30%
up	ve / bribes	2.0×	1.0×	100%	$300k	$3.7M	−70%
Chainflip	Buyback + burn	5.6×	5.6×	100%	$536k	$36.3M	+56%
Aero	ve / bribes	8.2×	3.8×	96%	$7.4M	$352.3M	−8%
Ekubo Protocolthis token	Buyback + burn	10.5×	10.2×	97%	$69k	$8.9M	−8%
PancakeSwap	Buyback + burn	21.0×	13.7×	65%	$2.4M	$602.4M	−29%
Raydium	Buyback	27.2×	16.9×	62%	$1.3M	$421.9M	−65%
Curve Finance	ve / bribes	30.7×	11.1×	94%	$2.6M	$376.7M	+44%
Uniswapleader	Buyback + burn	36.2×	36.2×	100%	$8.2M	$3.59B	−19%
Aster	Buyback + burn	51.2×	∞	—	$2.7M	$1.71B	—
Orca	Buyback	52.8×	8.1×	15%	$120k	$77.1M	−37%
Meteora	Distribution	162×	4.8×	17%	$480k	$166.1M	−54%

Score build-up25 of 100

Total score = 35% valuation + 25% momentum + 20% divergence + 20% quality − penalties, clamped to 0–100. Every number here can be recomputed from the figures on this page.

25of 100#41▼2top 54%

Valuation 24.0Momentum 0.0Divergence 0.0Quality 10.6penalties −10= 24.6

Valuation35%

69Valuation 68.6: HR half 64.3 (multiple 10.50×; 100 at ≤3×, 0 at ≥100×, log scale), revenue half 73.0 (revenue peer value 1.66×; 0 at ≤0.33×, 50 at 1×, 100 at ≥3×, log scale).Average of two halves. HR half: linear in log(multiple), 100 at ≤ 3×, 0 at ≥ 100×, 0 without effective HR. Revenue half: linear in log(revenue peer value), 0 at ≤ 0.33×, 50 at 1×, 100 at ≥ 3×; neutral 50 when the peer group falls back to the universe.

Momentum25%capped

0Momentum 0.0: m = 0.5·g7 −1.500 + 0.3·(ln(day jump 0.23) clamped ±1.5 = −1.451) + 0.2·g30 −0.079 = −1.201; 0 at ≤−0.7, 50 at 0, 100 at ≥1.1.m = 0.5·g7 + 0.3·ln(day jump, clamped ±1.5) + 0.2·g30; 0 at m ≤ −0.7, 50 at 0, 100 at ≥ 1.1. Neutral 50 when g7 or g30 is missing; a missing day jump counts as 0.

Divergence20%capped

0Divergence 0.0: d = g30 − p30 = 0.000; 0 at ≤0, 100 at ≥1.5.d = max(0, g30 − p30) when g30 > 0; 0 at d ≤ 0, 100 at d ≥ 1.5, linear.

Quality20%

53Quality 53.1: mean of days HR>0 100% → 100.0 (0 at ≤30%, 100 at ≥90%), largest day 33% of HR30 → 59.4 (0 at ≥60%, 100 at ≤15%), distance to peak 0.13 → 0.0 (0 at ≤0.25, 100 at ≥0.9).Average of: share of days with HR > 0 (0 at ≤ 30%, 100 at ≥ 90%), 1 − largest day ÷ HR30 (0 at ≥ 60%, 100 at ≤ 15%) and distance to peak (0 at ≤ 0.25, 100 at ≥ 0.9).

Penalty −10 (low_liquidity): DEX liquidity unknown below $250k and 24h volume $53k below $1.00M.

HR7 is below 50% of its 90-day peak: momentum and divergence are capped at 50. This is not a penalty; the distance already counts in quality.

Penalties−10

−10Liquidity below $250k (dex) or 24h volume below $1M (cex)DEX liquidity unknown below $250k and 24h volume $53k below $1.00M

9 rules not applied, 3 wait for research data.

Where the numbers come from

Revenue source: 2 active children; DefiLlama adapter per child
Price and market cap: defillama / defillama; latest fetch
Scored on: November 12, 2026; as-of date of the last compute run
On-chain verified: not yet; not checked yet

Protocols behind this token2 at DefiLlama

Per protocol: DefiLlama's methodology text, the distribution type we read from it and the sentence that decided it. The token takes the type of the protocol that returns the most to holders.

Ekubo
Dexs · Starknet, Ethereum, Robinhood Chain
type buyback-burn · source text
“Amount of fees used to buy back and burn EKUBO tokens on Starknet.”
Amount of fees used to buy back and burn EKUBO tokens on Starknet.
adapter on GitHub ↗
STONX
Dexs · Robinhood Chain
type ve-distribution · source label
“Swap Fees To veSTONX Voters: All swap fees routed to veSTONX voters.”
All swap fees are allocated to veSTONX voters in proportion to the voting power assigned to each pool.
Swap Fees To veSTONX Voters
All swap fees routed to veSTONX voters.
adapter on GitHub ↗