Storm Trade STORM

Payout off peakRank#13in Low payout▲2Score49

Paid to holders this week: 43% of the best week in 90 days ($3k against $7k), while revenue +141% over 30 days. Also: it is unclear where holders revenue goes.

Derivatives, TON, 193 days of data

Low payout: less than $100k to holders in 30 days, or payouts on fewer than 8 of the 30 days (for a token that pays in cycles of a week or longer: more than one of the payouts its cycle predicts missed); ranked within this group

Market cap

$1.5M

price $0.00408 · 7d +28.1% · 30d +33.8%

FDV $4.1M (2.7× market cap)

source defillama

Counted per year

$89k

holders revenue of the last 30 days, $15k, × 365 ÷ 30, × type factor 0.5 (an unclear use counts 50%)

Unclearbuyback share 100%

Returns 12% of its market cap a year, using 100¢ of every $1 it earns.

Not a buyback: counts for 50% in the multiple (type factor 0.5), so the denominator is $89k instead of $178k.

Multiple

17.3×

peer median 19.3× (Derivatives, 7 tokens), against 17.3× here

Run-rate

18.9×

last 7 days $3k × 52 × 0.5 (type factor) = $81k a year

last week's payout in line with the 30-day pace

What we checked

Valuation
Multiple 17.3× (type factor 0.5: an unclear use counts 50%), in line with its Derivatives peers (median 19.3×, 7 tokens). The group's largest earner Hyperliquid trades at 21.1×: 1.2× cheaper per dollar returned to holders. On total revenue: 8.6×, 1.5× cheaper than the revenue peer median.
Distribution
Unclear: The DefiLlama methodology does not say where holders revenue goes. Holders got $15k of $15k revenue in 30 days → buyback share 100%. DefiLlama: “Fees going to governance token holders”
Sustainability
Holders were paid on 30 of 30 days (100%); largest single day 29% of the month's holders revenue; paid to holders this week: 43% of the best week in 90 days (more than half below peak). Revenue −12% over 7 days and +141% over 30 days, price +34% over 30 days.

What this does not tell you

The figures come from DefiLlama's adapter for each child protocol. Only a few tokens have an on-chain check (see How the buyback really works); for the rest, whether the tokens were really bought, burned or parked in a treasury wallet is not checked here. Unlocks count where DefiLlama or our research has a vesting schedule; team discretion and liquidity depth only once researched.

Flags

Payout >50% below peakthis week's holders revenue is 43% of its best week in the last 90 days ($7k)

How the buyback really works

Not researched yet. Everything above comes from DefiLlama and market data only.

Holders revenue / revenue (30d): $15k / $15k; last 30 closed days
To holders: Returns 12% of its market cap a year
FDV / dilution: $4.1M / 2.7×; FDV ÷ market cap
Price 7d / 30d: +28.1% / +33.8%
Revenue growth 7d / 30d: −12% / +141%; versus the period before
Divergence: 0.59; revenue growth minus price growth, 30d
DEX liquidity: $261k; DexScreener, representative pools
24h volume: $242k; all markets, CoinGecko
Unlocks 30d: —; no unlock schedule for this token
Revenue multiple: 8.6×; market cap ÷ revenue per year
Fee multiple: 2.6×; market cap ÷ fees per year
Distance to peak: 43%; this week ÷ best week of 90 days
Data since: May 4; first day with holders revenue

Holders revenue and price

Holders revenue per day7-day averagePrice (right axis)

Multiple over time

today 17.3× (scored) · peer median 19.3×

Market cap at close ÷ (holders revenue of the previous 30 days × 365 ÷ 30), with holders revenue capped at revenue and × the type factor: the same effective multiple as the peer median. Values above 100× are drawn at the top. Bands as on the meter; dashed line = peer median today.

Signal history

No signals for this token yet.

Versus peers

Derivatives · 7 tokens · median multiple 19.3× · Hyperliquid is valued 11507.4× higher. Per dollar that counts for holders, Storm Trade is 1.2× cheaper.

Main-ranking peers only. Multiples count holders revenue capped at revenue, × the type factor (buyback 1 · buyback + burn 1 · burn 0.75 · mixed 0.75 · distribution 0.5 · unclear 0.5 · ve-distribution 0.25).

This token against its main-ranking peers: multiple, revenue multiple, buyback share, holders revenue, market cap and revenue growth
Token	Distribution	Multiple	Revenue multiple	Buyback share	To holders 30d	Market cap	Rev. growth 30d
Lighter	Buyback	15.8×	12.8×	81%	$4.4M	$841.1M	+12%
edgeX	Buyback	16.4×	7.1×	43%	$605k	$120.4M	−44%
Storm Tradethis token	Unclear	17.3×	8.6×	100%	$15k	$1.5M	+141%
ApeX Protocol	Mixed	19.3×	14.5×	100%	$148k	$26.1M	−20%
Hyperliquidleader	Buyback + burn	21.1×	21.1×	100%	$68.7M	$17.66B	−4%
GMX	Distribution	37.2×	13.6×	73%	$363k	$82.1M	+15%
dYdX	Distribution	54.8×	27.4×	100%	$234k	$77.9M	−21%

Score build-up49 of 100

Total score = 35% valuation + 25% momentum + 20% divergence + 20% quality − penalties, clamped to 0–100. Every number here can be recomputed from the figures on this page.

49of 100#13▲2top 16%

Valuation 20.6Momentum 12.5Divergence 7.8Quality 13.1penalties −5= 49.0

Valuation35%

59Valuation 58.9: HR half 50.1 (multiple 17.26×; 100 at ≤3×, 0 at ≥100×, log scale), revenue half 67.8 (revenue peer value 1.48×; 0 at ≤0.33×, 50 at 1×, 100 at ≥3×, log scale).Average of two halves. HR half: linear in log(multiple), 100 at ≤ 3×, 0 at ≥ 100×, 0 without effective HR. Revenue half: linear in log(revenue peer value), 0 at ≤ 0.33×, 50 at 1×, 100 at ≥ 3×; neutral 50 when the peer group falls back to the universe.

Momentum25%capped

50Momentum 67.7: m = 0.5·g7 −0.131 + 0.3·(ln(day jump 2.53) clamped ±1.5 = 0.928) + 0.2·g30 0.879 = 0.388; 0 at ≤−0.7, 50 at 0, 100 at ≥1.1.m = 0.5·g7 + 0.3·ln(day jump, clamped ±1.5) + 0.2·g30; 0 at m ≤ −0.7, 50 at 0, 100 at ≥ 1.1. Neutral 50 when g7 or g30 is missing; a missing day jump counts as 0.

Divergence20%capped

39Divergence 39.2: d = g30 − p30 = 0.588; 0 at ≤0, 100 at ≥1.5.d = max(0, g30 − p30) when g30 > 0; 0 at d ≤ 0, 100 at d ≥ 1.5, linear.

Quality20%

65Quality 65.3: mean of days HR>0 100% → 100.0 (0 at ≤30%, 100 at ≥90%), largest day 29% of HR30 → 68.4 (0 at ≥60%, 100 at ≤15%), distance to peak 0.43 → 27.6 (0 at ≤0.25, 100 at ≥0.9).Average of: share of days with HR > 0 (0 at ≤ 30%, 100 at ≥ 90%), 1 − largest day ÷ HR30 (0 at ≥ 60%, 100 at ≤ 15%) and distance to peak (0 at ≤ 0.25, 100 at ≥ 0.9).

Penalty −5 (dilution_above_2): dilution ratio 2.66 above 2.

HR7 is below 50% of its 90-day peak: momentum and divergence are capped at 50. This is not a penalty; the distance already counts in quality.

Penalties−5

−5Dilution ratio above 2dilution ratio 2.66 above 2

9 rules not applied, 3 wait for research data.

Where the numbers come from

Revenue source: 1 active child; DefiLlama adapter per child
Price and market cap: defillama / defillama; latest fetch
Scored on: November 12, 2026; as-of date of the last compute run
On-chain verified: not yet; not checked yet

Protocols behind this token1 at DefiLlama

Per protocol: DefiLlama's methodology text, the distribution type we read from it and the sentence that decided it. The token takes the type of the protocol that returns the most to holders.

Storm Trade
Derivatives · TON
type unclear · source text
“Fees going to governance token holders”
Fees going to governance token holders
adapter on GitHub ↗