Fulcrom FUL

Payout off peakRank#4in Low payout▼1Score57

Paid to holders this week: 36% of the best week in 90 days ($7k against $20k), while revenue +60% over 7 days. Also: part of holders revenue is paid out.

Derivatives, Cronos, ZKsync Era, Cronos zkEVM, 193 days of data

Low payout: less than $100k to holders in 30 days, or payouts on fewer than 8 of the 30 days (for a token that pays in cycles of a week or longer: more than one of the payouts its cycle predicts missed); ranked within this group

Market cap

$1.7M

price $0.000693 · 7d −3.0% · 30d −25.0%

FDV $14.0M (8.5× market cap)

source defillama

Counted per year

$193k

holders revenue of the last 30 days, $21k, × 365 ÷ 30, × type factor 0.75 (a mixed model counts 75%)

Mixedbuyback share 50%

Returns 16% of its market cap a year, using 50¢ of every $1 it earns.

Not a buyback: counts for 75% in the multiple (type factor 0.75), so the denominator is $193k instead of $258k.

Multiple

8.6×

peer median 19.3× (Derivatives, 7 tokens), against 8.6× here

Run-rate

5.9×

last 7 days $7k × 52 × 0.75 (type factor) = $279k a year

last week's payout to holders ran 1.4× the 30-day pace: the payout is speeding up

What we checked

Valuation
Multiple 8.6× (type factor 0.75: a mixed model counts 75%), 2.3× cheaper than its Derivatives peers (median 19.3×, 7 tokens). The group's largest earner Hyperliquid trades at 21.1×: 2.5× cheaper per dollar returned to holders. On total revenue: 3.2×, 4.0× cheaper than the revenue peer median.
Distribution
Mixed: Part buyback, part distribution or burn; the exact split is not known. Holders got $21k of $42k revenue in 30 days → buyback share 50%. DefiLlama: “Mint/Redeem Fees: 20% of the mint and burn fees goes to FUL stakers”
Sustainability
Holders were paid on 30 of 30 days (100%); largest single day 9% of the month's holders revenue; paid to holders this week: 36% of the best week in 90 days (more than half below peak). Revenue +60% over 7 days and +36% over 30 days, price −25% over 30 days.

What this does not tell you

The figures come from DefiLlama's adapter for each child protocol. Only a few tokens have an on-chain check (see How the buyback really works); for the rest, whether the tokens were really bought, burned or parked in a treasury wallet is not checked here. Unlocks count where DefiLlama or our research has a vesting schedule; team discretion and liquidity depth only once researched.

Flags

Payout >50% below peakthis week's holders revenue is 36% of its best week in the last 90 days ($20k)
Insufficient history192 days of data; g30, divergence not computable yet and scored as neutral 50
Data issue: chain mapping missingData issue (chain mapping missing): warning, scores are computed as usual

How the buyback really works

Not researched yet. Everything above comes from DefiLlama and market data only.

Holders revenue / revenue (30d): $21k / $42k; last 30 closed days
To holders: Returns 16% of its market cap a year
FDV / dilution: $14.0M / 8.5×; FDV ÷ market cap
Price 7d / 30d: −3.0% / −25.0%
Revenue growth 7d / 30d: +60% / +36%; versus the period before
Divergence: —; revenue growth minus price growth, 30d
DEX liquidity: $428k; DexScreener, representative pools
24h volume: $2k; all markets, CoinGecko
Unlocks 30d: —; no unlock schedule for this token
Revenue multiple: 3.2×; market cap ÷ revenue per year
Fee multiple: 1.3×; market cap ÷ fees per year
Distance to peak: 36%; this week ÷ best week of 90 days
Data since: May 4; first day with holders revenue

Holders revenue and price

Holders revenue per day7-day averagePrice (right axis)

Multiple over time

today 8.6× (scored) · peer median 19.3×

Market cap at close ÷ (holders revenue of the previous 30 days × 365 ÷ 30), with holders revenue capped at revenue and × the type factor: the same effective multiple as the peer median. Values above 100× are drawn at the top. Bands as on the meter; dashed line = peer median today.

Signal history

No signals for this token yet.

Versus peers

Derivatives · 7 tokens · median multiple 19.3× · Hyperliquid is valued 10659.1× higher. Per dollar that counts for holders, Fulcrom is 2.5× cheaper.

Main-ranking peers only. Multiples count holders revenue capped at revenue, × the type factor (buyback 1 · buyback + burn 1 · burn 0.75 · mixed 0.75 · distribution 0.5 · unclear 0.5 · ve-distribution 0.25).

This token against its main-ranking peers: multiple, revenue multiple, buyback share, holders revenue, market cap and revenue growth
Token	Distribution	Multiple	Revenue multiple	Buyback share	To holders 30d	Market cap	Rev. growth 30d
Fulcromthis token	Mixed	8.6×	3.2×	50%	$21k	$1.7M	+36%
Lighter	Buyback	15.8×	12.8×	81%	$4.4M	$841.1M	+12%
edgeX	Buyback	16.4×	7.1×	43%	$605k	$120.4M	−44%
ApeX Protocol	Mixed	19.3×	14.5×	100%	$148k	$26.1M	−20%
Hyperliquidleader	Buyback + burn	21.1×	21.1×	100%	$68.7M	$17.66B	−4%
GMX	Distribution	37.2×	13.6×	73%	$363k	$82.1M	+15%
dYdX	Distribution	54.8×	27.4×	100%	$234k	$77.9M	−21%

Score build-up57 of 100

Total score = 35% valuation + 25% momentum + 20% divergence + 20% quality − penalties, clamped to 0–100. Every number here can be recomputed from the figures on this page.

57of 100#4▼1top 4% one or more parts are the neutral 50

Valuation 29.8Momentum 12.5Divergence 10.0Quality 14.5penalties −10= 56.8

Valuation35%

85Valuation 85.0: HR half 70.1 (multiple 8.56×; 100 at ≤3×, 0 at ≥100×, log scale), revenue half 100.0 (revenue peer value 3.97×; 0 at ≤0.33×, 50 at 1×, 100 at ≥3×, log scale).Average of two halves. HR half: linear in log(multiple), 100 at ≤ 3×, 0 at ≥ 100×, 0 without effective HR. Revenue half: linear in log(revenue peer value), 0 at ≤ 0.33×, 50 at 1×, 100 at ≥ 3×; neutral 50 when the peer group falls back to the universe.

Momentum25%capped

50Momentum 50.0 (neutral): g7 0.469, g30 unknown; missing history gives the neutral 50.m = 0.5·g7 + 0.3·ln(day jump, clamped ±1.5) + 0.2·g30; 0 at m ≤ −0.7, 50 at 0, 100 at ≥ 1.1. Neutral 50 when g7 or g30 is missing; a missing day jump counts as 0.

Divergence20%capped

50Divergence 50.0 (neutral): d unknown (missing history).d = max(0, g30 − p30) when g30 > 0; 0 at d ≤ 0, 100 at d ≥ 1.5, linear.

Quality20%

72Quality 72.5: mean of days HR>0 100% → 100.0 (0 at ≤30%, 100 at ≥90%), largest day 9% of HR30 → 100.0 (0 at ≥60%, 100 at ≤15%), distance to peak 0.36 → 17.5 (0 at ≤0.25, 100 at ≥0.9).Average of: share of days with HR > 0 (0 at ≤ 30%, 100 at ≥ 90%), 1 − largest day ÷ HR30 (0 at ≥ 60%, 100 at ≤ 15%) and distance to peak (0 at ≤ 0.25, 100 at ≥ 0.9).

Penalty −10 (dilution_above_4): dilution ratio 8.46 above 4.

HR7 is below 50% of its 90-day peak: momentum and divergence are capped at 50. This is not a penalty; the distance already counts in quality.

Penalties−10

−10Dilution ratio above 4dilution ratio 8.46 above 4

9 rules not applied, 3 wait for research data.

Where the numbers come from

Revenue source: 1 active child; DefiLlama adapter per child
Price and market cap: defillama / defillama; latest fetch
Scored on: November 12, 2026; as-of date of the last compute run
On-chain verified: not yet; not checked yet

Protocols behind this token1 at DefiLlama

Per protocol: DefiLlama's methodology text, the distribution type we read from it and the sentence that decided it. The token takes the type of the protocol that returns the most to holders.

Fulcrom Perps
Derivatives · Cronos, ZKsync Era, Cronos zkEVM
type mixed · source label
“Mint/Redeem Fees: 20% of the mint and burn fees goes to FUL stakers”
20% of all collected fees goes to FUL stakers
Token Swap Fees
20% of the swap fees goes to FUL stakers
Liquidation Fees
20% of the liquidation fees goes to FUL stakers
Mint/Redeem Fees
20% of the mint and burn fees goes to FUL stakers
adapter on GitHub ↗